Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Response to FRs - Issues #267 and #290 - POC in RG Name and Deployment Snippets #312

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Nov 3, 2022
Merged

Response to FRs - Issues #267 and #290 - POC in RG Name and Deployment Snippets #312

merged 31 commits into from
Nov 3, 2022

Conversation

4pplied
Copy link
Contributor

@4pplied 4pplied commented Sep 2, 2022

Overview/Summary

Change in the READMEs of each of the modules which has a deployment snippet and also amendment of Resource Group Names to conform to CAF Standardisation. A PR to work on Issue #267 and #290

This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes

  1. Adds CAF Standardisation to Resource Group Names
  2. Adds deployment names into snippets
  3. Conforms deployment methods including names to CARML standards

Breaking Changes

  1. N/A - documentation

Testing Evidence

image

image

As part of this Pull Request I have

@ghost ghost added the Needs: Triage 🔍 Needs triaging by the team label Sep 2, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JamJarchitect Can we do this for all Bicep docs (like orchestration and CRML etc.)

Cheers

@ghost ghost removed the Needs: Author Feedback label Sep 12, 2022
@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Sep 12, 2022

@JamJarchitect Can we do this for all Bicep docs (like orchestration and CRML etc.)

Cheers

This should now be done @jtracey93

Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JamJarchitect sorry buddy.

Can we add and alz prefix to the deployment names just so they are easy to find/remember for users?

Also do we need to add a note for all bash usage that pwsh needs to be installed for the inputObject to work?

@ghost ghost removed the Needs: Author Feedback label Sep 12, 2022
@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Sep 12, 2022

@JamJarchitect sorry buddy.

Can we add and alz prefix to the deployment names just so they are easy to find/remember for users?

Also do we need to add a note for all bash usage that pwsh needs to be installed for the inputObject to work?

@jtracey93 prefix added, naming conventions done, NOTE added on bash on Private DNS zone as well. Any reviewer(s) are welcome!

jtracey93
jtracey93 previously approved these changes Sep 15, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me.

@rjygraham would you mind casting a 2nd set of eyes over this.

@msftbot do not merge until @jtracey93 & @rjygraham have approved

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run validateazcloud

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

@msftbot do not merge until @jtracey93 Jack Tracey FTE & @rjygraham Ryan Graham FTE have approved

@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Oct 10, 2022

/azp run validateazcloud

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 312 in repo Azure/ALZ-Bicep

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run validateazcloud

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

@rjygraham are you good to give this a review now @JamJarchitect has converted the bash to native cli?

4pplied and others added 2 commits October 11, 2022 11:08
Co-authored-by: Jack Tracey <41163455+jtracey93@users.noreply.github.com>
@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

sorry to chase @rjygraham have you had a chance to review this one, or do we need to reassign?

@oZakari
Copy link
Contributor

oZakari commented Oct 28, 2022

@jtracey93 This looks good to me.

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

@JamJarchitect can we resolve the merge conflicts here and then we can look to merge 👍

Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @JamJarchitect,

Finally found time to review, but apologies for the amount of comments

infra-as-code/bicep/CRML/containerRegistry/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infra-as-code/bicep/CRML/containerRegistry/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infra-as-code/bicep/CRML/containerRegistry/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infra-as-code/bicep/CRML/containerRegistry/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infra-as-code/bicep/CRML/containerRegistry/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infra-as-code/bicep/orchestration/hubPeeredSpoke/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
infra-as-code/bicep/orchestration/hubPeeredSpoke/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@jtracey93 jtracey93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @JamJarchitect 2 things to fix and think we are good

infra-as-code/bicep/CRML/subscriptionAlias/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@4pplied
Copy link
Contributor Author

4pplied commented Nov 2, 2022

@jtracey93 those last two amendments were done. should all be good now!

@jtracey93
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run validateazcloud

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@jtracey93 jtracey93 merged commit 503e9af into Azure:main Nov 3, 2022
@4pplied 4pplied deleted the snippetsandpocname branch November 21, 2022 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants