Output added to resourceGroup module.

[KiZach]

Overview/Summary

Added outputs to make depends-on support better for sub modules deploying into the created resource group.

This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes

Support for using an output to make dependencies in bicep file.

Breaking Changes

None

Testing Evidence

Only adds output to module, so tested it with a simple main bicep file.

Inputs:

Outputs:

As part of this Pull Request I have

• Checked for duplicate Pull Requests
• Associated it with relevant ADO items
• Ensured my code/branch is up-to-date with the latest changes in the main branch
• Performed testing and provided evidence.
• Updated relevant and associated documentation.

[jtracey93]

Thanks @KiZach,

Out of interest how does this help as you cannot use the name or ID from an output of one module to pass into another module today as it creates a circular dependency as per:

Just want to understand before we look to merge this PR

Thanks

Jack

[KiZach]

Hi @jtracey93

You are right, did some more tests and found why it was working on another Bicep project.

I used the CARML module https://github.com/Azure/ResourceModules/tree/main/arm/Microsoft.Resources/resourceGroups in another project, this has the outputs. And on this project the RG name was used as a param not scope to 'sub' modules for extracting the 'applicationname' that was part of the resource group name.

So I think this PR can be closed.