-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated logic to determine if a data set is a PDS & fixed non existent source data set bug #2448
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Pujal <pujal.gandhi@broadcom.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2448 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.49% 91.49% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 641 641
Lines 18416 18415 -1
Branches 4000 3998 -2
==========================================
- Hits 16850 16849 -1
Misses 1563 1563
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Pujal <pujal.gandhi@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Pujal <pujal.gandhi@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Pujal <pujal.gandhi@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Pujal <pujal.gandhi@broadcom.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
really cool stuff! 🥳
happy for tormally review once it's ready 😋
📅 Suggested merge-by date: 3/12/2025 |
|
What It Does
dsorgs
ofPO-E
,PO-L
,PO-U
are handled correctly.pds: Some PDS operations may have unexpected behavior #2390
copyPds: Misssing
source
PDS throws a non-user-friendly error #2447How to Test
For the non existent source data set fix:
Review Checklist
I certify that I have:
Additional Comments