FixedScaleOffset doc: change scale parameter type to float

[bogovicj]

This PR is a small change to the documentation of the FixedScaleOffset:
changing the type of the scale parameter from int to float.

The filter currently behaves reasonably and as I would expect if a passing a float to the scale parameter:

# random angles in the range [-pi,pi]
x = (np.random.random([64]) * 2 * np.pi) - np.pi

# encode in the range [0,255] with a byte
f = FixedScaleOffset(scale= (255.0 / (2.0 * np.pi) ), offset=-np.pi, dtype='float64', astype='uint8')

# behaves as expected
x_enc = f.encode(x)
x_dec = f.decode(x_enc)

and is a potentially useful application of this filter.

As well, this documentation change makes this filter's description consistent with the scale_factor and add_offset attributes of NetCDF.

When scale_factor and add_offset are used for packing, the associated variable (containing the packed data) is typically of type byte or short, whereas the unpacked values are intended to be of type float or double. The attributes scale_factor and add_offset should both be of the type intended for the unpacked data, e.g. float or double.

(emphasis mine)

TODO:

• Unit tests and/or doctests in docstrings
• tox -e py310 passes locally
• Docstrings and API docs for any new/modified user-facing classes and functions
• Changes documented in docs/release.rst
• tox -e docs passes locally
• GitHub Actions CI passes
• Test coverage to 100% (Coveralls passes)

[jakirkham]

Thanks John! 🙏

This makes sense to me. Should we add an example in the docstring and maybe a test filter here?

[dstansby]

Since this is an improvement I think worth getting it in, even without an example.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.91%. Comparing base (4784a52) to head (862c846).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #356   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.91%   99.91%           
=======================================
  Files          59       59           
  Lines        2334     2334           
=======================================
  Hits         2332     2332           
  Misses          2        2           

Files	Coverage Δ
numcodecs/fixedscaleoffset.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)

[jakirkham]

Adding a test to this file would be good though. As currently this is untested behavior