You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hey, is there a certain reason why e.g. the kmeans_openmp benchmark is compiled and linked with -g and -O2, when best performance should be expected without -g and with -O3? Makefile
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, sorry that I never ran these openmp benchmarks by myself, but I'd say
that O3 optimization is faster *in general*. Some algorithms and data
structures may fail the higher-degree optimization.
I suggest search for the cases where O3 is slower and check whether the
pattern appears in this benchmark.
(Sent from my phone)
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 11:25 AM Anton Oellerer ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey, is there a certain reason why e.g. the kmeans_openmp benchmark is
compiled with -g and -O2, when best performance should be expected
without -g and with -O3?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABOLNC6BHAJ4CVPAYPKL5PLQVAIZJA5CNFSM4JQTXQ42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4H3OJA4Q>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOLNC5KZYMDZDVFHQTFISDQVAIZJANCNFSM4JQTXQ4Q>
.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hey, is there a certain reason why e.g. the
kmeans_openmp
benchmark is compiled and linked with-g
and-O2
, when best performance should be expected without-g
and with-O3
?Makefile
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: