Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restore recvmsg in udp_socket_posix #4151

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Restore recvmsg in udp_socket_posix #4151

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

maxz-lab
Copy link
Contributor

A recent change (PR3904) replaced recvmsg() with recvfrom unnecessarily. This change to restore the recvmsg().

b/302741384

A recent change (PR3904) replaced recvmsg() with recvfrom
unnecessarily. This change to restore the recvmsg().

b/302741384
@maxz-lab maxz-lab requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 15:39
@datadog-cobalt-youtube
Copy link

datadog-cobalt-youtube bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: maxz-sb16-missing
Commit report: e1b68df
Test service: cobalt

✅ 0 Failed, 228913 Passed, 42 Skipped, 38m 10.69s Total Time

@maxz-lab maxz-lab requested review from jellefoks and johnxwork and removed request for dahlstrom-g September 24, 2024 16:53
To make the upstream easier, the changes made in _posix files
for socket API changes are clearly guarded by macro
defined(STARBOARD).

b/302741384
Copy link
Member

@jellefoks jellefoks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Yes while this makes the Starboard difference look very involved, that kind of is the point and now it is very visible how our adaptation is different from upstream. There are probably cleanups we can do form here, but this makes that task possible with direct vision on what changes we did make.

@maxz-lab maxz-lab enabled auto-merge (squash) October 1, 2024 19:35
@maxz-lab maxz-lab disabled auto-merge October 3, 2024 03:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants