GH workflows: linting, 3rd party license, and doc check #29
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BOT_REPO_SCOPED_TOKENrepo secret for the bot to properly detect changes and auto-commit to repo as part of the GH workflows.Downgraded generate-license-file from v2 to v1 to match the version in shared workflow (output format is slightly different). I tried to migrate the workflow to latest (v3) but noticed a bug so I submitted an issue report in their repo: TobyAndToby/generate-license-file#250. Once that is done, the workflow version and the local devDep version of generate-license-file can be updated
J=CLIP-100
TEST=auto
see that the workflows ran as expected as checks under this PR