Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(#904) CollectionEnvelope.equals compare objects of Collection interface #1057

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 27, 2019
Merged

(#904) CollectionEnvelope.equals compare objects of Collection interface #1057

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 27, 2019

Conversation

scratchboom
Copy link

No description provided.

@0crat 0crat added the scope label Jan 31, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 31, 2019

Job #1057 is now in scope, role is REV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jan 31, 2019

This pull request #1057 is assigned to @fabriciofx/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @llorllale/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

Copy link
Contributor

@fabriciofx fabriciofx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@scratchboom Done. Please, check it out.

@@ -144,6 +147,18 @@ public void differentHashCode() {
);
}

@Test
public void collectionEnvelopeShouldBeEqualToCollection() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@scratchboom Please, test if an empty CollectionEnvelope and an empty Collection are equals.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fabriciofx see new changes

`Assertion.affirm()` call added.
Test `emptyCollectionEnvelopeShouldBeEqualToEmptyCollection` added.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1057 into master will increase coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master    #1057     +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage     87.47%   87.57%   +0.1%     
- Complexity     1515     1519      +4     
===========================================
  Files           265      267      +2     
  Lines          3887     3895      +8     
  Branches        212      215      +3     
===========================================
+ Hits           3400     3411     +11     
+ Misses          438      435      -3     
  Partials         49       49
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...ava/org/cactoos/collection/CollectionEnvelope.java 100% <100%> (ø) 26 <1> (-1) ⬇️
src/main/java/org/cactoos/func/Retry.java 55% <0%> (-18.08%) 3% <0%> (-4%)
...rc/main/java/org/cactoos/func/IoCheckedBiProc.java 0% <0%> (ø) 0% <0%> (ø) ⬇️
src/main/java/org/cactoos/text/SuffixOf.java 100% <0%> (ø) 3% <0%> (?)
src/main/java/org/cactoos/text/PrefixOf.java 100% <0%> (ø) 3% <0%> (?)
...c/main/java/org/cactoos/io/LoggingInputStream.java 97.33% <0%> (+6.92%) 19% <0%> (+3%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4e1fbea...4afb64b. Read the comment docs.

@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@fabriciofx ping

@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2019

@0crat refuse (here)

@llorllale The user @fabriciofx/z resigned from #1057, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Feb 27, 2019

@rultor merge

@llorllale OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2019

This pull request #1057 is assigned to @iprogrammerr/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @llorllale/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@rultor rultor merged commit 4afb64b into yegor256:master Feb 27, 2019
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Feb 27, 2019

@rultor merge

@llorllale Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 14min)

@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

@rultor release, tag is 0.40

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Feb 27, 2019

@rultor release, tag is 0.40

@llorllale OK, I will release it now. Please check the progress here

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2019

Quality is low, no payment, see §31:

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2019

Job was finished in 0 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Feb 27, 2019
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2019

The job #1057 is now out of scope

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 27, 2019

Payment to ARC for a closed pull request, as in §28: +10 point(s) just awarded to @llorllale/z

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Feb 27, 2019

@rultor release, tag is 0.40

@llorllale Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 14min)

llorllale added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants