Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

YQL-17087: Add channel spilling to dq pipe communication #612

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

Darych
Copy link
Collaborator

@Darych Darych commented Dec 20, 2023

No description provided.

@Darych Darych changed the title Add channel spilling to dq pipe communication YQL-17087: Add channel spilling to dq pipe communication Dec 20, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🔴 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: some tests FAILED for commit b8acf67.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
57862 48679 0 6 9133 44

🔴 linux-x86_64-release-asan: some tests FAILED for commit b8acf67.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
14084 13958 0 22 73 31

@Darych Darych requested a review from rvu1024 December 21, 2023 07:05
Copy link
Contributor

@resetius resetius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@Darych Darych merged commit ad5da4d into ydb-platform:main Dec 22, 2023
2 of 4 checks passed
@Darych Darych deleted the YQL-17087-chan-spilling-concurrent branch December 22, 2023 14:15
marsaly79 pushed a commit to marsaly79/ydb that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
…m#612)

* Add channel spilling to dq pipe communication
* Add EvPoison handler to DqChannelStorageActor
@jepett0 jepett0 mentioned this pull request Dec 28, 2023
This was referenced Dec 29, 2023
Closed
@vitstn vitstn mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants