Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

issue-1350: hard links for external modes should return correct node #1600

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

debnatkh
Copy link
Collaborator

References #1350
Continuation of #1595

@debnatkh debnatkh added the filestore Add this label to run only cloud/filestore build and tests on PR label Jul 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🟢 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: all tests PASSED for commit 2198edb.

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
1660 1660 0 0 0 0

Copy link
Contributor

Note

This is an automated comment that will be appended during run.

🟢 linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo: all tests PASSED for commit c7b3f9a.

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
1660 1660 0 0 0 0

@debnatkh debnatkh changed the title issue-1350: hard links for eexternal modes should return correct node issue-1350: hard links for external modes should return correct node Jul 15, 2024
@debnatkh debnatkh merged commit 09c4d43 into main Jul 15, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@debnatkh debnatkh deleted the users/debnatkh/issue-1350-fix-hardlinks-2 branch July 15, 2024 09:54
debnatkh added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
…1600)

* issue-1350: hard links for eexternal modes should return correct node

* fix review issues
debnatkh added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
…hould return correct node (#1604)

* issue-1350: hard links for external modes should return correct node (#1600)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
filestore Add this label to run only cloud/filestore build and tests on PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants