Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Parsing Functionality in parseFile.ts #373

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

XxAlonexX
Copy link

Description:

This pull request introduces enhancements to the parseFile.ts file within the repomix project. The following changes have been made:

  1. Configuration Utilization: The function now utilizes the removeComments and removeEmptyLines options from the configuration schema. This allows users to customize the parsing behavior based on their needs.

  2. Error Handling: Removed the check for the non-existent property someSetting, which was causing TypeScript compilation errors.

  3. Debug Logging: Added logging to track the configuration settings used during parsing, improving traceability and debugging capabilities.

Changes Summary:

  • Updated the parseFile function to include configuration options.
  • Enhanced logging for better visibility into the parsing process.
  • Ensured compatibility with TypeScript's type system by removing invalid property checks.

Impact:

These changes improve the flexibility and maintainability of the parsing functionality, allowing for better integration with user-defined configurations.

Testing:

  • The changes have been built successfully without errors.
  • Further testing will be conducted to ensure that the new configuration options work as intended.

Checklist:

  • Code is clean and follows contribution guidelines.
  • Documentation has been updated if necessary.
  • Tests have been added or updated to cover new functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the parseFile function in the tree-sitter module by adding two new configuration options: removeComments and removeEmptyLines. These options are extracted from the config.output object, defaulting to false if not specified. A debug logging statement is introduced to log the current parsing configuration, detailing the values of these options. The core functionality of parsing the file content into an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) remains unchanged, but the processing logic is modified to conditionally filter parsed chunks based on the new options. If removeComments is enabled, comment lines are filtered out according to language-specific syntax, and if removeEmptyLines is enabled, empty lines are removed from the processed chunks. These modifications are integrated into the existing control flow without altering the fundamental behavior of the function.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant ParseFile
    participant Logger

    Caller->>ParseFile: Call parseFile(file, config)
    ParseFile->>ParseFile: Extract config.output.removeComments (default false)
    ParseFile->>ParseFile: Extract config.output.removeEmptyLines (default false)
    ParseFile->>Logger: Log current configuration (removeComments, removeEmptyLines)
    ParseFile->>ParseFile: Continue with file parsing and AST processing
    ParseFile->>Caller: Return parsed results
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7324ba9 and 8297f56.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/core/tree-sitter/parseFile.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/core/tree-sitter/parseFile.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/core/tree-sitter/parseFile.ts (1)

41-90: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement the filtering logic for comments and empty lines.

You've added configuration options but haven't implemented the functionality to actually remove comments or empty lines based on these settings.

Consider implementing the filtering logic in the chunk processing section. For example:

  if (!processedChunks.has(normalizedChunk)) {
    processedChunks.add(normalizedChunk);
+   
+   // Apply filtering based on configuration
+   let processedChunk = chunk;
+   
+   if (shouldRemoveComments) {
+     // Filter out comment lines based on language-specific comment syntax
+     // This would require language-specific logic to identify comments
+   }
+   
+   if (shouldRemoveEmptyLines) {
+     // Split by newlines, filter out empty lines, and rejoin
+     processedChunk = processedChunk
+       .split('\n')
+       .filter(line => line.trim() !== '')
+       .join('\n');
+   }
+   
-   chunks.push(chunk);
+   chunks.push(processedChunk);
  }

Note that proper comment removal is language-specific and might require more complex logic depending on the programming language being parsed.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/core/tree-sitter/parseFile.ts (1)

20-20: Update the TODO comment.

The TODO comment at line 20 mentions that the config parameter is not used, but your changes now use it to extract configuration options.

- // TODO: Do something with config: RepomixConfigMerged, it is not used (yet)
+ // Config is used to apply output formatting options
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c8b60c and 7324ba9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/core/tree-sitter/parseFile.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/core/tree-sitter/parseFile.ts (2)

45-48: Configuration options added but not utilized.

You've successfully added configuration options for removing comments and empty lines. However, these options aren't actually used anywhere in the parsing logic to modify the output.

While the configuration options have been defined, there's no implementation that uses these values to filter comments or empty lines in the resulting chunks. Either implement this functionality or add a TODO comment to track this for future implementation.


49-53: Good debugging enhancement.

Adding debug logging for the configuration options improves visibility into the parsing process, which aligns well with the PR objective to enhance debugging and traceability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant