Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve semantics of hyperrectangle csr conditions #117

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

rpreen
Copy link
Member

@rpreen rpreen commented Dec 8, 2023

Resolves #116

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (9c78c08) 70.26% compared to head (efc6aff) 70.25%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
xcsf/param.c 66.66% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #117      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.26%   70.25%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          62       62              
  Lines        8913     8912       -1     
  Branches     1079     1079              
==========================================
- Hits         6263     6261       -2     
- Misses       2650     2651       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rpreen rpreen changed the title fix semantics of hyperrectangle csr conditions improve semantics of hyperrectangle csr conditions Dec 8, 2023
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@rpreen rpreen merged commit 562ee67 into master Dec 8, 2023
9 of 10 checks passed
@rpreen rpreen deleted the 116_hyperrectangle_csr_semantics branch December 8, 2023 11:59
dpaetzel added a commit to dpaetzel/RunRSLBench.jl that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
Since [this PR](xcsf-dev/xcsf#117), XCSF's
center-spread intervals are considered fully closed intervals.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Semantics of rectangle-based conditions differ
1 participant