Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Assignment object due date extension #66

Closed
garemoko opened this issue Apr 26, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Assignment object due date extension #66

garemoko opened this issue Apr 26, 2016 · 10 comments
Labels
feat

Comments

@garemoko
Copy link
Contributor

garemoko commented Apr 26, 2016 •
edited
Loading

JISC have an extension http://xapi.jisc.ac.uk/extensions/duedate which contains the assignment due date as an ISO 8601 timestamp. We should use this.
@ryasmi
Copy link
Member

ryasmi commented Apr 26, 2016

If we don't want to replicate that, but we want to use their extension, then JISC need to change that before we implement it differently here.

@ryasmi
Copy link
Member

ryasmi commented Apr 26, 2016

I think @andrewhickey had an issue with that.

@ryasmi ryasmi added this to the v1.0.1 milestone Apr 26, 2016
@ryasmi ryasmi added feat and removed fix labels Apr 26, 2016
@ryasmi ryasmi modified the milestones: v1.1.0, v1.0.1 Apr 26, 2016
@jlowe64 jlowe64 modified the milestones: v1.3.0, v1.1.0 Jun 2, 2016
@davidpesce davidpesce modified the milestones: v1.3.0, v1.5.0 May 30, 2017
@ryasmi ryasmi modified the milestones: v1.5.0, v2.1.0 Jun 15, 2017
@ryasmi
Copy link
Member

ryasmi commented Aug 28, 2018

Which events was this intended to be added to @garemoko?

@garemoko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Both the assignment ones (graded and submitted)

@ryasmi
Copy link
Member

ryasmi commented Aug 28, 2018

Ok nice, thanks @garemoko 👍

@ryasmi
Copy link
Member

ryasmi commented Jan 31, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Note to self this is for assignment_graded and assignment_submitted

@ryasmi ryasmi mentioned this issue Jan 31, 2019
Closed
@garemoko
Copy link
Contributor Author

garemoko commented Feb 1, 2019

Note: the JISC extension has a weird object-with-one-property structure. We shouldn't replicate this.

@ryansmith94 do you know if that's still an issue?

@ryasmi
Copy link
Member

ryasmi commented Feb 5, 2019

No it's no longer an issue according to example statements I've seen and their documentation.

@garemoko
Copy link
Contributor Author

garemoko commented Feb 6, 2019

Edited the issue to remove that note.

@ryasmi ryasmi removed this from the v2.2.0 milestone Feb 18, 2019
@davidpesce
Copy link
Collaborator

JISC branch has been merged into master. We are good to go here!

FlorianTolk pushed a commit to adlnet/moodle-logstore_xapi that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2024
@milt
Course module completion disambiguation (xAPI-vle#66)
fe77291 
* switch survey to submitted to remove conflict

* disambiguate scorm content from module

* scos dont have intros
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feat
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@jlowe64 @garemoko @ryasmi @davidpesce