Skip to content

chore: upgrade eslint from v8 to v9 #707

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 28, 2025

Conversation

ersachin3112
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

upgrade eslint from v8 to v9

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.20%. Comparing base (d2651fc) to head (eb9937d).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/utils.js 95.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #707      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.30%   88.20%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         359      356       -3     
  Branches      118      118              
==========================================
- Hits          317      314       -3     
  Misses         38       38              
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit b29fde3 into webpack-contrib:master Jul 28, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants