Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cookie-related OWNERS and READMEs #7531

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions cookie-store/OWNERS
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
@bsittler
@pwnall
6 changes: 1 addition & 5 deletions cookie-store/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,2 @@
This directory contains tests for the
[Async Cookies API](https://github.com/WICG/cookie-store). The tests are
written using [WPT](web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/testharness-api.html)
style, and will be upstreamed to the
[Web Platform Tests project](http://web-platform-tests.org) once our
implementation is far enough that we feel confident writing a specification.
[Async Cookies API](https://github.com/WICG/cookie-store).
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions cookies/OWNERS
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
@mikewest
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions cookies/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
This directory contains tests for
[Leave Secure Cookies Alone](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone-01).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/master/cookies/path/match.html covers a bit more than the IETF draft you linked. I think this is a reasonable first step and we can rely on @mikewest's guidance for the next step 😸