Update F2.html #4128
Update F2.html #4128
Conversation
- removed example 3 - updated outcome logic of checks 1 and 2 - added a third condition to check 2
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
modified the introduction to include the third check in test 2
techniques/failures/F2.html
Outdated
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | |||
| <!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 due to using changes in text presentation to convey information without using the appropriate markup or text</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../css/editors.css" class="remove"/></head><body><h1>Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 due to using changes in text presentation to convey information without using the appropriate markup or text</h1><section class="meta"><p class="id">ID: F2</p><p class="technology">Technology: failures</p><p class="type">Type: Failure</p></section><section id="applicability"><h2>When to Use</h2> | |||
| <p>All technologies that support images or presentation markup.</p> | |||
| </section><section id="description"><h2>Description</h2> | |||
| <p>This document describes a failure that occurs when a change in the appearance of text conveys meaning without using appropriate semantic markup. This failure also applies to images of text that are not enclosed in the appropriate semantic markup.</p> | |||
| <p>This document describes a failure that occurs when a change in the appearance of text conveys meaning without using appropriate semantic markup, or without using text styling that is conveyed by assistive technology. This failure also applies to images of text that are not enclosed in the appropriate semantic markup.</p> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(per TF discussion) It feels off to add this clause when the rest of the PR is specifically removing the only example where it would apply. In the headings examples, it wouldn't be sufficient for ATs to convey a change in text styling; that wouldn't be sufficient to convey the semantic heading structure.
I would lean more towards updating the technique to more specifically talk about not using non-semantic visual techniques to present stuff that looks semantically relevant (the 2 remaining examples with headings are good, could also add something like "using a left-margin and images instead of a semantic list to indicate a list" if we want a non-heading example)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
okay, thanks @dbjorge.
I will pull back on additive material for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dbjorge please re-review so this can be merged if/when supported by WG.
|
Discussed on backlog call 11-1. Concern on call with only having heading examples, since CSS can semantically be used to convey emphasis. |
Pulled back expansion of the failure technique to include presentation markup detected by assistive technologies.
|
Created a new issue to track unincorporated changes #4132 |
rephrased the introduction to include mention of assistive technologyadded a third condition to check 2Resolves #4109