Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nonTransferable property in v2.0? #1037

Closed
Sakurann opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

nonTransferable property in v2.0? #1037

Sakurann opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
discuss pending close Close if no objection within 7 days

Comments

@Sakurann
Copy link
Contributor

separating the discussion in issue #731.

The use-case is mentioned in this comment, also there is a PR in the use-case document.

Currently, there is no agreement to define nonTransferable property in v2.0, and instead those who need this property will define a separate extension vocabulary and JSON-LD Context (comment).

@David-Chadwick
Copy link
Contributor

The non-transferrable property can actually be specified as one particular type of Terms Of Use. It does not need to be a special credential property. I think it would be helpful to the world to standardise the type for this particular ToU

@Sakurann Sakurann added the pending close Close if no objection within 7 days label Apr 11, 2023
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Apr 12, 2023

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-04-11

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

1.11. nonTransferable property in v2.0? (issue vc-data-model#1037)

See github issue vc-data-model#1037.

Kristina Yasuda: based this "nonTransferable property in v2.0?" question on an issue we closed.
… asks for volunteers? pending close?.
… yep - pending close.

1 similar comment
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Apr 12, 2023

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-04-11

  • no resolutions were taken
View the transcript

1.11. nonTransferable property in v2.0? (issue vc-data-model#1037)

See github issue vc-data-model#1037.

Kristina Yasuda: based this "nonTransferable property in v2.0?" question on an issue we closed.
… asks for volunteers? pending close?.
… yep - pending close.

@brentzundel
Copy link
Member

No objections since being marked pending close, closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss pending close Close if no objection within 7 days
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants