Add the random trace id flag (#474) (#486)

* Add the random trace id flag

* Wording

* Wording

Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add SHOULD wording to trace id randomness

* Specify that implementers SHOULD set random flag when appropriate

* Random flag means at least 7 bytes

* Flag wording

* Only 2 flags are specified

* Remove redundant wording

* At least 7 bytes

* Review comments

* Remove RECOMMENDED wording

Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>

spec/20-http_request_header_format.md

@@ -100,13 +100,17 @@ trace-flags      = 2HEXDIGLC   ; 8 bit flags. Currently, only one bit is used. S
 
 #### trace-id
 
-This is the ID of the whole trace forest and is used to uniquely identify a <a href="#dfn-distributed-traces">distributed trace</a> through a system. It is represented as a 16-byte array, for example, `4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736`. All bytes as zero (`00000000000000000000000000000000`) is considered an invalid value.
+This is the ID of the whole trace forest and is used to uniquely identify a <a href="#dfn-distributed-traces">distributed trace</a> through a system.
+It is represented as a 16-byte array, for example, `4bf92f3577b34da6a3ce929d0e0e4736`.
+All bytes as zero (`00000000000000000000000000000000`) is considered an invalid value.
 
-If the `trace-id` value is invalid (for example if it contains non-allowed characters or all zeros), vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent`.
+The value of `trace-id` SHOULD be globally unique.
+One recommended method to ensure global uniqueness, as well as to address some privacy and security considerations, to a satisfactory degree of certainty is to randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generate the `trace-id`.
+Implementers SHOULD use a `trace-id` generation method which randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generates at least the right-most 7 bytes of the ID.
+If the right-most 7 bytes are randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated, the corresponding [random trace id flag](#random-trace-id-flag) SHOULD be set.
+For more details, see [considerations for trace-id field generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation).
 
-See [considerations for trace-id field
-generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation) for recommendations
-on how to operate with `trace-id`.
+If the `trace-id` value is invalid (for example if it contains non-allowed characters or all zeros), vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent`.
 
 #### parent-id
 
@@ -116,6 +120,8 @@ Vendors MUST ignore the `traceparent` when the `parent-id` is invalid (for examp
 
 #### trace-flags
 
+The current version of this specification (`00`) supports only two flags: `sampled` and `random-trace-id`.
+
 An <a data-cite='!BIT-FIELD#firstHeading'>8-bit field</a>  that controls tracing flags such as sampling, trace level, etc. These flags are recommendations given by the caller rather than strict rules to follow for three reasons:
 
 1. An untrusted caller may be able to abuse a tracing system by setting these flags maliciously.
@@ -126,20 +132,22 @@ You can find more in the section [Security considerations](#security-considerati
 
 Like other fields, `trace-flags` is hex-encoded. For example, all `8` flags set would be `ff` and no flags set would be `00`.
 
-As this is a bit field, you cannot interpret flags by decoding the hex value and looking at the resulting number. For example, a flag `00000001` could be encoded as `01` in hex, or `09` in hex if present with the flag `00001000`. A common mistake in bit fields is forgetting to mask when interpreting flags.
+As this is a bit field, the flags cannot be interpreted by a simple equality comparison.
+For example, both `01` (`00000001`) and `03` (`00000011`) represent that the trace has been sampled because the sampled flag (`00000001`) is set, and `03` and `02` (`00000010`) both represent that at least the right-most 7 bytes of the `trace-id` are randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated because the random bit (`00000010`) is set.
+A common mistake when interpreting bit-fields is using a comparison of the whole number rather than interpreting a single bit.
 
 Here is an example of properly handling trace flags:
 
 ``` java
 static final byte FLAG_SAMPLED = 1; // 00000001
+static final byte FLAG_RANDOM = 2; // 00000010
 ...
 boolean sampled = (traceFlags & FLAG_SAMPLED) == FLAG_SAMPLED;
+boolean random = (traceFlags & FLAG_RANDOM) == FLAG_RANDOM;
 ```
 
 ##### Sampled flag
 
-The current version of this specification (`00`) only supports a single flag called `sampled`.
-
 When set, the least significant bit (right-most), denotes that the caller may have recorded trace data. When unset, the caller did not record trace data out-of-band.
 
 There are a number of recording scenarios that may break distributed tracing:
@@ -176,6 +184,17 @@ There are two additional options that vendors MAY follow:
 - A component that makes a deferred or delayed recording decision may communicate the priority of a recording by setting `sampled` flag to `1` for a subset of requests.
 - A component may also fall back to probability sampling and set the `sampled` flag to `1` for the subset of requests.
 
+##### Random Trace ID Flag
+
+The second least significant bit of the trace-flags field denotes the random-trace-id flag.
+If that flag is set, at least the right-most 7 bytes of the trace ID MUST be random (or pseudo-random).
+If the flag is not set, the trace ID MAY still be randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated.
+When unset, the trace ID MAY be generated in any way that satisfies the requirements of the [trace ID format](#trace-id).
+
+When at least the right-most 7 bytes of the `trace-id` are randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated, the random trace ID flag SHOULD be set to `1`.
+This allows downstream consumers to implement features such as trace sampling or database sharding based on these bytes.
+For additional information, see [considerations for trace-id field generation](#considerations-for-trace-id-field-generation).
+
 ##### Other Flags
 
 The behavior of other flags, such as (`00000100`) is not defined and is reserved for future use. Vendors MUST set those to zero.

spec/60-trace-id-format.md

@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ concerns](#privacy-considerations) of exposing unwanted information. Randomness
 also allows tracing vendors to base sampling decisions on `trace-id` field value
 and avoid propagating an additional sampling context.
 
+If the `random-trace-id` flag is set, at least the right-most 7 bytes of the
+`trace-id` MUST be randomly (or pseudo-randomly) generated.
+
 As shown in the next section, if part of the `trace-id` is nonrandom,
 it is important for the random part of the `trace-id` to be as far right in the
 `trace-id` as possible for better inter-operability with some existing systems.
@@ -50,7 +53,9 @@ systems with these existing systems, the following practices are recommended:
    compliant 16 bytes `trace-id` from a shorter identifier, it SHOULD left pad
    the original identifier with zeroes. For example, the identifier
    `53ce929d0e0e4736`, SHOULD be converted to `trace-id` value
-   `000000000000000053ce929d0e0e4736`.
+   `000000000000000053ce929d0e0e4736`. If the resultant `trace-id` value does
+   not satisfy the constraints of the `random-trace-id` flag, the flag MUST
+   be set to `0`.
 2. When a system receives an inbound message and needs to convert the 16 bytes
    `trace-id` to a shorter identifier, the rightmost part of `trace-id` SHOULD
    be used as this identifier. For instance, if the value of `trace-id` was