Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactored "run" and "processEpubFile" file methods #933

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2019

Conversation

GrayWolfMT
Copy link
Collaborator

Refactored "run" and "processEpubFile" file methods to actually run the same code to ensure consistent behavior.

Also removed several duplicate or unused methods.

Reworked "processArguments" method to use regular expressions and a switch statement.

@rdeltour rdeltour self-requested a review January 7, 2019 13:24
@rdeltour rdeltour added type: improvement The issue suggests an improvement of an existing feature status: needs review Needs to be reviewed by a team member before further processing labels Jan 7, 2019
@rdeltour rdeltour self-assigned this Jan 10, 2019
@rdeltour rdeltour added this to the 4.2.0-alpha-1 milestone Jan 10, 2019
@rdeltour rdeltour changed the base branch from master to next/v4.2.0 January 14, 2019 04:10
- Make `run` and `processEpubFile` methods run the same code to ensure
  consistent behavior.
- Remove several duplicate or unused methods.
- Rework `processArguments` method to use regular expressions and a
  switch statement.
@rdeltour rdeltour merged commit 3ed77fe into next/v4.2.0 Jan 14, 2019
@rdeltour rdeltour removed their request for review January 14, 2019 09:11
@rdeltour rdeltour added status: completed Work completed, can be closed and removed status: needs review Needs to be reviewed by a team member before further processing labels Jan 14, 2019
@rdeltour rdeltour deleted the main-cleanup branch January 14, 2019 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: completed Work completed, can be closed type: improvement The issue suggests an improvement of an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants