[css-position] Animatable and Animation type fields are contradictory for position property

[simevidas]

Link to spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position/#position-property

The definition card for the position property includes these fields:

• Animatable: no
• Animation type: discrete

How can that be? Doesn’t discrete mean that it is animatable?

[tabatkins]

A block shouldn't have both lines; it's a markup mistake.

@fantasai, you added the Animation type: discrete back in 6516a86 - was the switch to "discrete" rather than "none" intentional? I assume 'position' was "none" because it triggers 'display' changes, right?

[Loirooriol]

Apparently, position is discretely animatable in Blink, WebKit and Gecko. And this can blockify display. https://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/9857

[tabatkins]

Since everyone supports discrete animation, I removed the "no" line and left the "discrete" line.

(Assuming commenter satisfied since the bug was fixed in an obvious fashion.)