Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add decision about user management for services #97

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

Kidswiss
Copy link
Contributor

@Kidswiss Kidswiss commented May 16, 2024

Summary

Decision about the user management, permissions and other related topics.

Checklist

  • Try to isolate changes into separate PRs (to build a better changelog).
  • Categorize the PR by setting a good title and adding one of the labels:
    change, decision, requirement/quality, requirement/functional, dependency
    as they show up in the changelog
  • Link this PR to related issues if applicable.

@Kidswiss Kidswiss added the decision A decision that changes the architecture label May 16, 2024
@Kidswiss Kidswiss self-assigned this May 16, 2024
@Kidswiss Kidswiss requested review from a team, TheBigLee, wejdross and zugao and removed request for a team May 16, 2024 12:26
@Kidswiss Kidswiss removed their assignment May 16, 2024
@Kidswiss Kidswiss requested a review from tobru May 17, 2024 08:31
@Kidswiss Kidswiss force-pushed the decision/user_management branch from 49c538d to 191da52 Compare May 17, 2024 08:53
Copy link
Contributor

@zugao zugao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Kidswiss Kidswiss merged commit b7bf794 into master May 21, 2024
1 check passed
@Kidswiss Kidswiss deleted the decision/user_management branch May 21, 2024 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
decision A decision that changes the architecture
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants