don't explicitly include puppet-lint #183
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
we've multiple gems as puppet-lint plugins that all requier puppet-lint
|
We should discuss if we want to pull it from rubygems instead of git directly or if we want it as an implicit dep. based on a discussion at voxpupuli/puppet-corosync#292 |
|
LGTM. Personally, I'd say go with the released version. |
|
PLEASE do not pull from head, or sometime in the future modules will pull 3.0.0 directly but the checks will be looking for |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
we've multiple gems as puppet-lint plugins that all requier puppet-lint