readme - benchmark results

README.md

@@ -193,13 +193,17 @@ hyperfine \
   'seqhasher --headersonly --hash xxhash,murmur3 big.fasta - > /dev/null'
 ```
 
-| Command    |      Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] |    Relative |
-|:---------- | -------------:| -------:| -------:| -----------:|
-| sha1     | 1.753 ± 0.328 |   1.549 |   2.532 | 1.43 ± 0.41 |
-| md5      | 2.120 ± 0.437 |   1.685 |   2.718 | 1.73 ± 0.52 |
-| xxhash   | 1.223 ± 0.269 |   0.921 |   1.512 | 1.00        |
-| cityhash | 1.288 ± 0.250 |   1.038 |   1.647 | 1.05 ± 0.31 |
-| murmur3  | 1.224 ± 0.230 |   1.032 |   1.610 | 1.00 ± 0.29 |
+| Command        |      Mean [s] | Min [s] | Max [s] |    Relative |
+|:---------------|--------------:|--------:|--------:|------------:|
+| sha1           | 1.646 ± 0.056 |   1.566 |   1.754 | 1.64 ± 0.11 |
+| md5            | 1.774 ± 0.082 |   1.666 |   1.937 | 1.76 ± 0.13 |
+| xxhash         | 1.006 ± 0.059 |   0.963 |   1.134 |        1.00 |
+| cityhash       | 1.101 ± 0.035 |   1.059 |   1.171 | 1.09 ± 0.07 |
+| murmur3        | 1.079 ± 0.021 |   1.051 |   1.114 | 1.07 ± 0.07 |
+| nthash         | 2.216 ± 0.069 |   2.134 |   2.318 | 2.20 ± 0.15 |
+| blake3         | 1.707 ± 0.024 |   1.662 |   1.731 | 1.70 ± 0.10 |
+| sha1+blake3    | 3.672 ± 0.214 |   3.424 |   3.921 | 3.65 ± 0.30 |
+| xxhash+murmur3 | 2.273 ± 0.237 |   2.070 |   2.819 | 2.26 ± 0.27 |
 
 As shown, xxHash and MurmurHash3 offer the best performance, while MD5 is the slowest among the tested algorithms.