Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Doc] add instructions about building vLLM with VLLM_TARGET_DEVICE=empty #7403

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024

Conversation

tomeras91
Copy link
Contributor

Following #4773 - Add the option to build vLLM with VLLM_TARGET_DEVICE=empty to the docs.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which consists a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of default ones by unblocking the steps in your fast-check build on Buildkite UI.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, please make sure to run full CI as it is required to merge (or just use auto-merge).

To run full CI, you can do one of these:

  • Comment /ready on the PR
  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Member

@youkaichao youkaichao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the contribution!

@youkaichao youkaichao merged commit 02b1988 into vllm-project:main Aug 11, 2024
25 of 28 checks passed
@tomeras91 tomeras91 deleted the empty-wheel-docs branch August 12, 2024 15:00
sfc-gh-mkeralapura pushed a commit to sfc-gh-mkeralapura/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
kylesayrs pushed a commit to neuralmagic/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
fialhocoelho pushed a commit to opendatahub-io/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants