Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: external URLs don't have to start with http(s) #17369

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

asivery
Copy link

@asivery asivery commented Jun 1, 2024

Description

Right now, when building, vite checks if the base provided is an external URL by checking if it starts with https:// or http://. This doesn't have to be the case. When working with electron, for example, one can create a custom protocol, then load the page with it. Right now setting the base to sandbox:// causes a broken app in electron. This PR fixes it.

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@asivery asivery changed the title fix: External URLs don't have to start with http(s) fix: external URLs don't have to start with http(s) Jun 1, 2024
@DaveFlashNL
Copy link

yeah, cos an external url can also be a local file in electron right, so if it's hardcoded for http(s) it would break on 'file:///', right?

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

/ecosystem-ci run

@vite-ecosystem-ci
Copy link

📝 Ran ecosystem CI on c956ba2: Open

suite result latest scheduled
astro failure failure
nuxt failure failure
vike failure failure
vite-plugin-react-pages failure failure
vite-plugin-vue failure success
vitest failure failure

analogjs, histoire, ladle, laravel, marko, previewjs, quasar, qwik, rakkas, remix, sveltekit, unocss, vite-plugin-pwa, vite-plugin-react, vite-plugin-react-swc, vite-plugin-svelte, vite-setup-catalogue, vitepress

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

/ecosystem-ci run vite-plugin-vue

@vite-ecosystem-ci
Copy link

📝 Ran ecosystem CI on cc138b0: Open

vite-plugin-vue

@patak-dev patak-dev added the p2-to-be-discussed Enhancement under consideration (priority) label Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Member

@patak-dev patak-dev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see a reason to limit a external URL to only be http. Users could be using ipfs:// for example. The original function was added as part of bigger features so there is no history about having to restrict it: fbf7ab4#diff-071a32aedd2ea59472ebb69fb456e818b103d1a332da632e12c2d54395938ad1R10

@sapphi-red
Copy link
Member

I think file:// URLs should not be externalized as it was working like that.

One thing to point out is that IIUC this will make non-enforce: pre plugins not able to handle ids with protocols (e.g. virtual-module:, virtual:, custom:).
This line would set external: true.

return options.idOnly ? id : { id, external: true }

virtual: seems to be used in many places (GitHub search result).

I think we can fix this by either

  1. implement Support external in dev #6582
  2. add a fallback plugin that runs after other plugins and externalizes any id with protocol

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

Good call with file://, that shouldn't be considered external.

Could you expand on the virtual: issue? The regex will only match ids with xxx://, no?

@sapphi-red
Copy link
Member

The regex will only match ids with xxx://, no?

My bad, forgot that the regex includes // 😅

@sapphi-red
Copy link
Member

Just noticed that file:// URLs doesn't work in Vite now 🫠 Probably want to support it in future though.

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

/ecosystem-ci run

@vite-ecosystem-ci

This comment was marked as outdated.

@patak-dev patak-dev added this to the 6.0 milestone Aug 21, 2024
@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

/ecosystem-ci run

@vite-ecosystem-ci
Copy link

📝 Ran ecosystem CI on 01f7432: Open

suite result latest scheduled
astro failure success
nuxt failure failure
qwik failure failure
vite-plugin-pwa failure success
vitest failure failure

analogjs, histoire, ladle, laravel, marko, previewjs, quasar, rakkas, remix, sveltekit, unocss, vike, vite-plugin-react, vite-plugin-react-swc, vite-plugin-svelte, vite-plugin-vue, vite-setup-catalogue, vitepress

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

The vite-plugin-pwa looks like a fluke due to a failed sharp install. @bluwy, the Astro fail seems legit. It seems there is a test for file:// in Astro's CI. So if this is expected to work, we could keep file:// as no external for now.

@bluwy
Copy link
Member

bluwy commented Aug 23, 2024

I don't know if this would fix it, but Astro has a file:// plugin here, and I'm guessing it's a matter of marking it enforce: 'pre'. Let me see if I can do that without breaking anything.

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

here

It seems that Astro decided to make file://path URLs equivalent to path though. If Vite resolves them as external by default and frameworks start to add plugins to change them to regular paths it could get confusing. I don't know what is the best here though, we could argue for both. Maybe we could dig more into why Astro decided making them no external was the right call?

@bluwy
Copy link
Member

bluwy commented Aug 23, 2024

For me (and also mentioned in the meeting), I think it would be nice if Vite can support it in the future, and this is also more of a stop point. file:// urls wouldn't really work normally otherwise, and they shouldn't be as different to absolute paths. @matthewp added it in withastro/astro#9407, maybe he can fill in more details if this should be supported in core or not.

@patak-dev
Copy link
Member

If we want to do this, for now maybe we shouldn't change how file:// works (by making them external). We can modify this PR to keep returning false for file:// from isExternal() for now.

@bluwy
Copy link
Member

bluwy commented Aug 23, 2024

I think either way works for me, but since this will be merged in the next major, it shouldn't have a big impact in practice.

@matthewp
Copy link
Contributor

matthewp commented Aug 24, 2024

We did it this way because we use URLs almost exclusively and it was easier just to pass the URL as a module specifier rather than convert it to a path. I'm always unsure if paths needed to be converted to forward slashes, or if they can start with C:\, etc. so this just seemed easier. I know normalizePath is maybe what we should be using instead.

I don't think I understand the logic of why file:// should be externalized by default. I guess I sort of understand why you're doing it that way for http(s), although I don't know if I'd necessarily do it that way if it were me, but files are just files and starting with file:// doesn't signal to me that this is some external thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
p2-to-be-discussed Enhancement under consideration (priority)
Projects
Status: P2 - 5
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants