-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invalid code generated in the gradient when using operators #1087
Comments
|
gojakuch
added a commit
to gojakuch/clad
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2024
This commit fixes the way Clad generates code. Specifically, it addresses the way operators appear in the generated code in the reverse mode and the way nested name qualifiers are built in both modes. Fixes: vgvassilev#1050 Fixes: vgvassilev#1087
gojakuch
added a commit
to gojakuch/clad
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
This commit fixes the way Clad generates code. Specifically, it addresses the way operators appear in the generated code in the reverse mode and the way nested name qualifiers are built in both modes. Fixes: vgvassilev#1050 Fixes: vgvassilev#1087
gojakuch
added a commit
to gojakuch/clad
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2024
This commit fixes the way Clad generates code. Specifically, it addresses the way operators appear in the generated code in the reverse mode and the way nested name qualifiers are built in both modes. This partially fixes vgvassilev#1050. Fixes: vgvassilev#1087
gojakuch
added a commit
to gojakuch/clad
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2024
This commit fixes the way Clad generates code. Specifically, it addresses the way operators appear in the generated code in the reverse mode and the way nested name qualifiers are built in both modes. This partially fixes vgvassilev#1050. Fixes: vgvassilev#1087
gojakuch
added a commit
to gojakuch/clad
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2024
This commit fixes the way Clad generates code. Specifically, it addresses the way operators appear in the generated code in the reverse mode and the way nested name qualifiers are built in both modes. This partially f ixes vgvassilev#1050. Fixes: vgvassilev#1087
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
reproducer:
generates code with the following line:
which is invalid and should be replaced with
double q = t[x];
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: