Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix handling of break and continue statements for rangebased loops in reverse mode #1019

Closed
ovdiiuv opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Fix handling of break and continue statements for rangebased loops in reverse mode #1019

ovdiiuv opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ovdiiuv
Copy link
Collaborator

ovdiiuv commented Aug 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Computing gradient for

double fn(double x){
  double a[] = {x};
  for(auto i: a){
    if(0)
      break;
  }
  return 0;
}

results in an error.
@ovdiiuv ovdiiuv changed the title Fix handling of break and continue statements in reverse mode Fix handling of break and continue statements for range base loops in reverse mode Aug 1, 2024
@ovdiiuv ovdiiuv changed the title Fix handling of break and continue statements for range base loops in reverse mode Fix handling of break and continue statements for rangebased loops in reverse mode Aug 1, 2024
@ovdiiuv ovdiiuv mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2024
Merged
ovdiiuv pushed a commit to ovdiiuv/clad that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2024
Redesign of the rangebased for loops body
035ddce 
Fixes:vgvassilev#1019
Fixes:vgvassilev#1033
vgvassilev pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2024
@ovdiiuv
Redesign of the rangebased for loops body (#1034)
6cc83ee 
Fixes:#1019
Fixes:#1033
@vgvassilev
Copy link
Owner

Fixed by #1034

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vgvassilev @ovdiiuv