You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As titled, and we had that in 1.x if I recall it correctly :)
One case that makes this necessary is in ARM/M1 Mac the Docker Desktop is not in good enough shape to enable multi-container communication in case it's running x64 container, thus nebula-docker-compose won't work properly.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't want to provide users with such an all in one container. I prefer to build an arm-arch docker image for nebula to solve user problems. Later we can provide an all in one docker compose orchestration file, which can contain our nebula service, studio service or explore service and so on. This makes more sense for users to start all nebula services in one command.
I don't want to provide users with such an all in one container. I prefer to build an arm-arch docker image for nebula to solve user problems. Later we can provide an all in one docker compose orchestration file, which can contain our nebula service, studio service or explore service and so on. This makes more sense for users to start all nebula services in one command.
Agreed, even better! That'll be awesome to have one compose file with both core and graphic interface services/observation services with arch64 support!
As titled, and we had that in 1.x if I recall it correctly :)
One case that makes this necessary is in ARM/M1 Mac the Docker Desktop is not in good enough shape to enable multi-container communication in case it's running x64 container, thus nebula-docker-compose won't work properly.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: