Enhancement：Support more type value as parameter #461
Conversation
|
|
|
@wey-gu |
| put(Value.class, (Setter<Value>) (param) -> param ); | ||
| put(boolean.class, (Setter<Boolean>) Value::bVal); | ||
| put(Boolean.class, (Setter<Boolean>) Value::bVal); | ||
| put(int.class, (Setter<Integer>) Value::iVal); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is it necessary to put the base data type class? such as int.class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is it necessary to put the base data type class? such as int.class.
Yes, the hashcode is different between Integer.class and int.class
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is it necessary to put the base data type class? such as int.class.
Yes, the hashcode is different between
Integer.classandint.class
Oh... It is unnecessary... when int auto sealing, intVal.getClass() return Integer. base data type will never be visited
You are right. @Nicole00
| @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ | |||
| // Copyright 2022-present Weicheng Ye. All rights reserved. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please update the copyright
There was a problem hiding this comment.
please update the copyright
Sorry, It was my mistake.
|
@Nicole00 |
Yeah, we require java 8. |
No description provided.