-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add distinction between Development and Production runtime_type for Turbopack #7711
Merged
sokra
merged 4 commits into
main
from
03-12-Add_distinction_between_Development_and_Production_runtime_type_for_Turbopack
Mar 13, 2024
Merged
Add distinction between Development and Production runtime_type for Turbopack #7711
sokra
merged 4 commits into
main
from
03-12-Add_distinction_between_Development_and_Production_runtime_type_for_Turbopack
Mar 13, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
6 Ignored Deployments
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. Join @timneutkens and the rest of your teammates on Graphite |
✅ This change can build |
🟢 Turbopack Benchmark CI successful 🟢Thanks |
|
timneutkens
force-pushed
the
03-12-Add_distinction_between_Development_and_Production_runtime_type_for_Turbopack
branch
from
March 12, 2024 21:50
e91e81f
to
91691c1
Compare
sokra
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2024
sokra
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2024
sokra
deleted the
03-12-Add_distinction_between_Development_and_Production_runtime_type_for_Turbopack
branch
March 13, 2024 12:00
timneutkens
added a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
## What? Implementation of vercel/turborepo#7711 <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-2791 --------- Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711) ### Description Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711) ### Description Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711) ### Description Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711) ### Description Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.