Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add distinction between Development and Production runtime_type for Turbopack #7711

Conversation

timneutkens
Copy link
Member

@timneutkens timneutkens commented Mar 12, 2024

Description

Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.

@timneutkens timneutkens requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2024 19:29
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
examples-gatsby-web 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-nonmonorepo ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-svelte-web 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
rust-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
6 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
examples-basic-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-designsystem-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-kitchensink-blog ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-native-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-tailwind-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 13, 2024 9:38am
examples-vite-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 13, 2024 9:38am

Copy link
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @timneutkens and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2024

✅ This change can build next-swc

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2024

🟢 Turbopack Benchmark CI successful 🟢

Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2024

⚠️ CI failed ⚠️

The following steps have failed in CI:

  • Turbopack Rust tests (mac/win, non-blocking)

See workflow summary for details

@timneutkens timneutkens force-pushed the 03-12-Add_distinction_between_Development_and_Production_runtime_type_for_Turbopack branch from e91e81f to 91691c1 Compare March 12, 2024 21:50
@sokra sokra merged commit 8914538 into main Mar 13, 2024
48 of 51 checks passed
@sokra sokra deleted the 03-12-Add_distinction_between_Development_and_Production_runtime_type_for_Turbopack branch March 13, 2024 12:00
timneutkens added a commit to vercel/next.js that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
## What?

Implementation of vercel/turborepo#7711

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->


Closes NEXT-2791

---------

Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
ForsakenHarmony pushed a commit to vercel/next.js that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711)

### Description

Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production
builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a
production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development
and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the
production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production
specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
ForsakenHarmony pushed a commit to vercel/next.js that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711)

### Description

Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production
builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a
production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development
and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the
production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production
specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
ForsakenHarmony pushed a commit to vercel/next.js that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711)

### Description

Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production
builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a
production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development
and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the
production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production
specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
ForsakenHarmony pushed a commit to vercel/next.js that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
…urbopack (vercel/turborepo#7711)

### Description

Currently the development Turbopack runtime is always used as production
builds are not fully implemented yet. This is the first step to having a
production-specific runtime by adding a distinction between Development
and Production for the runtime. This PR does not implement the
production runtime, it only adds the plumbing for adding the production
specific runtime. The runtime implementation will follow in a later PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants