Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix linting between lint-check and lint-staged #74503

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ijjk
Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk commented Jan 3, 2025

This ensures we match our linting checks between lint-staged and our lint-eslint step as previously we weren't linting all the files we should have been leading to errors showing up when lint-stage would run but not when our normal lint step ran.

x-ref: slack thread

@ijjk ijjk added created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. Documentation Related to Next.js' official documentation. examples Issue was opened via the examples template. tests labels Jan 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2025

All broken links are now fixed, thank you!

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
"git-clean": "git clean -d -x -e node_modules -e packages -f",
"typescript": "tsc --noEmit",
"lint-typescript": "turbo run typescript",
"lint-eslint": "cross-env ESLINT_USE_FLAT_CONFIG=false eslint . --ext js,jsx,ts,tsx --config .eslintrc.cli.json --no-eslintrc",
"lint-eslint": "cross-env ESLINT_USE_FLAT_CONFIG=false eslint . --ext js,jsx,mjs,ts,tsx,mts,mdx --config .eslintrc.json --no-eslintrc",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we delete the .eslintrc.cli.json file now that its unused?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that is meant for use with vscode to not apply as many checks.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How would vscode know to use that file? 🤔

@ijjk ijjk requested a review from styfle January 3, 2025 22:45
@ijjk
Copy link
Member Author

ijjk commented Jan 3, 2025

Stats from current PR

Default Build
General
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
buildDuration 20.2s 18.5s N/A
buildDurationCached 17.5s 14.6s N/A
nodeModulesSize 417 MB 417 MB N/A
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 515ms 507ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
1187-HASH.js gzip 52.6 kB 52.6 kB N/A
8276.HASH.js gzip 169 B 168 B N/A
8377-HASH.js gzip 5.44 kB 5.44 kB N/A
bccd1874-HASH.js gzip 52.8 kB 52.8 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 57.5 kB 57.5 kB N/A
main-app-HASH.js gzip 232 B 235 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 34.1 kB 34.1 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.71 kB 1.71 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Overall change 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 512 B 510 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 343 B 342 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.84 kB 1.84 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 265 B 265 B
head-HASH.js gzip 363 B 362 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 393 B 392 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.57 kB 4.57 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 268 B 268 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.35 kB 2.34 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 328 B 328 B
script-HASH.js gzip 397 B 397 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 323 B 326 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.59 kB 3.59 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 749 B 747 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
index.html gzip 524 B 524 B
link.html gzip 539 B 538 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 521 B 520 B N/A
Overall change 524 B 524 B
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 128 kB 128 kB N/A
page.js gzip 206 kB 206 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 670 B 669 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 31.2 kB 31.2 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 844 B 844 B
Overall change 844 B 844 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
274-experime...dev.js gzip 322 B 322 B
274.runtime.dev.js gzip 314 B 314 B
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 363 kB 363 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 129 kB 129 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 142 kB 142 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 138 kB 138 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 352 kB 352 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 125 kB 125 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 37.5 kB 37.5 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 25.5 kB 25.5 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.5 kB 25.5 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 39.2 kB 39.2 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.69 kB 9.69 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 11.6 kB 11.6 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.68 kB 9.68 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 27.5 kB 27.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 916 kB 916 kB
Overall change 2.44 MB 2.44 MB
build cache
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js ijjk/fix-lint-check Change
0.pack gzip 2.08 MB 2.08 MB N/A
index.pack gzip 74.4 kB 74.3 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Diff details
Diff for main-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: 2396250

@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
"parser": "eslint-mdx",
"rules": {
"react/jsx-no-undef": "off",
"react/self-closing-comp": "error"
"react/self-closing-comp": "off"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if you intended to change this but its probably fine

@ijjk ijjk enabled auto-merge (squash) January 3, 2025 23:02
@ijjk ijjk merged commit 2e114e4 into canary Jan 3, 2025
130 checks passed
@ijjk ijjk deleted the ijjk/fix-lint-check branch January 3, 2025 23:17
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. Documentation Related to Next.js' official documentation. examples Issue was opened via the examples template. locked tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants