Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: filter out middleware requests in logging #64549

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

huozhi
Copy link
Member

@huozhi huozhi commented Apr 16, 2024

What

When middleware.js is present, the logging is duplicated. We should filter out the 1st middleware request and only log the actual one going through request handler / renderer

Closes NEXT-3125

@huozhi huozhi force-pushed the fix/duplicated-middleware-log branch from 6f323e0 to ec5537c Compare April 16, 2024 09:05
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Apr 16, 2024

Tests Passed

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Apr 16, 2024

Stats from current PR

Default Build
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
buildDuration 15.9s 16s N/A
buildDurationCached 8.8s 7.4s N/A
nodeModulesSize 199 MB 199 MB ⚠️ +852 B
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 431ms 437ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
2453-HASH.js gzip 31.4 kB 31.4 kB N/A
3304.HASH.js gzip 181 B 181 B
3f784ff6-HASH.js gzip 53.7 kB 53.7 kB
8299-HASH.js gzip 5.1 kB 5.1 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 45.2 kB 45.2 kB
main-app-HASH.js gzip 242 B 242 B
main-HASH.js gzip 29.6 kB 29.7 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.68 kB 1.68 kB N/A
Overall change 99.3 kB 99.3 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 196 B 197 B N/A
_error-HASH.js gzip 184 B 184 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 505 B 505 B
css-HASH.js gzip 324 B 325 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 2.5 kB 2.5 kB N/A
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 258 B 258 B
head-HASH.js gzip 352 B 352 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 370 B 371 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.27 kB 4.27 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 259 B 259 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.67 kB 2.67 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 314 B 312 B N/A
script-HASH.js gzip 386 B 386 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 309 B 309 B
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 6.63 kB 6.63 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 483 B 485 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
index.html gzip 529 B 529 B
link.html gzip 542 B 542 B
withRouter.html gzip 524 B 524 B
Overall change 1.59 kB 1.59 kB
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 95.5 kB 95.5 kB N/A
page.js gzip 3.05 kB 3.05 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 623 B 625 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 25.5 kB 25.5 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 839 B 839 B
Overall change 839 B 839 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 171 kB 171 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 97.5 kB 97.5 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 99.2 kB 99.2 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 93.5 kB 93.5 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 145 kB 145 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 92 kB 92 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 21.5 kB 21.5 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 15.2 kB 15.2 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 15.2 kB 15.2 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 14.9 kB 14.9 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 21.1 kB 21.1 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 14.9 kB 14.9 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.55 kB 9.55 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 9.82 kB 9.82 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.55 kB 9.55 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 22.5 kB 22.5 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 23.1 kB 23.1 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 22.5 kB 22.5 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 51.5 kB 51.5 kB
Overall change 949 kB 949 kB
build cache
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js fix/duplicated-middleware-log Change
0.pack gzip 1.59 MB 1.59 MB N/A
index.pack gzip 107 kB 107 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Diff details
Diff for middleware.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: 264d1d9

@huozhi huozhi marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 09:34
Copy link
Member

@eps1lon eps1lon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does the PR say it's related to middleware request logging but then we add a test for logging page requests only once? I'm not familiar with the intended behavior so I probably missed something.

@huozhi
Copy link
Member Author

huozhi commented Apr 16, 2024

It's because in that testing project we have a middleware.js

So a request goes like req -> middleware -> request handler. And it will pass through the handling in next-server twice. We logged in both middleware phase and the final request handler phase. So we checked the header if the 1st request is for middleware. Then when you request a path like GET /foo you won't see it's logged in next-server twice.

@eps1lon
Copy link
Member

eps1lon commented Apr 16, 2024

I believe I get it now 😄

@huozhi huozhi merged commit 2a1e170 into canary Apr 16, 2024
79 checks passed
@huozhi huozhi deleted the fix/duplicated-middleware-log branch April 16, 2024 14:17
ztanner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
When middleware.js is present, the logging is duplicated. We should
filter out the 1st middleware request and only log the actual one going
through request handler / renderer

Closes NEXT-3125
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked label May 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 1, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants