Skip to content

chore(openai): remove legacy function calling #5640

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025
Merged

chore(openai): remove legacy function calling #5640

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025

Conversation

samdenty
Copy link
Member

@samdenty samdenty commented Apr 9, 2025

Background

Summary

Tasks

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • You've followed the PR contributing guidelines for adding a patch changeset to version packages and fixing prettier issues

Future Work

@samdenty samdenty changed the base branch from main to v5 April 9, 2025 18:14
lgrammel
lgrammel approved these changes Apr 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@lgrammel lgrammel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pls add a changeset

@samdenty samdenty merged commit c2b92cc into v5 Apr 10, 2025
4 of 7 checks passed
@samdenty samdenty deleted the chore/remove-legacy-functions branch April 10, 2025 10:13
samdenty added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
@samdenty
fix(#5640): update snapshot
2227453
samdenty added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
@samdenty
fix(#5640): update snapshot (#5657)
c77e1d9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lgrammel lgrammel lgrammel approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@samdenty @lgrammel