Update libs dependency #2749
Closed
Update libs dependency #2749
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
5ab879d
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://7268b502.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://create-pull-request-patch.vald.pages.dev |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request includes updates to various templates and Dockerfiles. The Rust version has been incremented from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (22)
📒 Files selected for processing (54)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (47)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
github-actions
bot
added
area/discoverer
area/manager/index
area/filter/ingress
area/filter/egress
type/ci
area/agent/sidecar
area/tools/cli/loadtest
area/gateway/lb
area/gateway/filter
area/agent/core/faiss
area/agent/core/ngt
area/gateway/mirror
area/index/job/correction
area/index/job/creation
area/index/job/save
area/index/job/readreplica
size/L
priority/low
labels
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
go.mod (1)
Line range hint
1-546: Overall dependency update strategy looks solidThe dependency updates follow good practices:
- Coordinated updates across related packages (e.g., AWS SDK, Google Cloud)
- Consistent use of semantic versioning
- Minor version bumps that maintain backward compatibility
- Proper handling of direct and indirect dependencies
Consider automating these updates with tools like Dependabot or Renovate for more frequent, automated updates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (22)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/core/agent.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/discoverer/discoverer.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/filter/egress/egress_filter.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/filter/ingress/ingress_filter.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/mirror/mirror.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/rpc/errdetails/error_details.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/filter.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/flush.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/index.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/insert.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/object.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/remove.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/search.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/update.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/upsert.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goexample/client/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumrust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (38)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md(1 hunks).github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md(1 hunks).github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/coverage.yaml(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/dev/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/example/client/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile(1 hunks)example/client/go.mod(2 hunks)go.mod(11 hunks)k8s/index/job/deletion/configmap.yaml(0 hunks)k8s/index/job/deletion/cronjob.yaml(0 hunks)versions/BUF_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/HELM_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/actions/CODECOV_CODECOV_ACTION(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- k8s/index/job/deletion/configmap.yaml
- k8s/index/job/deletion/cronjob.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (33)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile
- dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile
- dockers/dev/Dockerfile
- dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile
- dockers/example/client/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile
- dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile
- dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile
- versions/BUF_VERSION
- versions/HELM_VERSION
- versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION
- versions/actions/CODECOV_CODECOV_ACTION
🔇 Additional comments (5)
example/client/go.mod (2)
14-16: Verify compatibility of genproto package updates
The google.golang.org/genproto and related packages are being updated to a newer snapshot version. While these are automated updates, it's important to verify compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
The previous attempt failed because we tried to clone an external repository. Let's analyze the local codebase instead to understand the impact of these dependency updates and verify if there are any potential compatibility issues.
Based on the analysis of the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:
Genproto dependency update appears safe to proceed
The codebase scan reveals that google.golang.org/genproto is primarily used in generated protobuf files (*.pb.go) under the apis/grpc directory. The update aligns all genproto-related packages to the same version (v0.0.0-20241113202542-65e8d215514f), which maintains consistency. Since these are generated files and the changes are automated dependency updates, the risk is minimal.
- The version mismatch in require section (v0.0.0-20241104194629-dd2ea8efbc28) will be overridden by the replace directives, so it's not a concern
- All genproto usage is confined to generated protobuf code
- The update follows the standard Go module versioning pattern for main branch snapshots
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any major API changes or breaking changes in the genproto updates
git clone https://github.com/googleapis/go-genproto.git /tmp/genproto
cd /tmp/genproto
git log --oneline --no-merges v0.0.0-20241104194629-dd2ea8efbc28..v0.0.0-20241113202542-65e8d215514f -- googleapis/rpc googleapis/api
Length of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the changes:
# 1. Check if there are any breaking changes in the codebase between these versions
rg -l "google.golang.org/genproto" --type go
# 2. Check the go.mod content to understand dependencies better
cat example/client/go.mod
# 3. Check for any API usage patterns that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'import "$_"' --lang go
Length of output: 10833
18-18: Verify protobuf patch version update
The update from v1.35.1 to v1.35.2 is a patch version bump which should only contain bug fixes.
✅ Verification successful
Since we couldn't fetch the changelog directly, let's try to verify the impact of this protobuf update within the codebase itself.
Let's check the current protobuf version in the codebase and look for any version-specific code.
Based on the analysis of the go.mod files, I can now provide a final response:
Protobuf update v1.35.1 to v1.35.2 is safe to proceed
The update is a patch version bump and the codebase explicitly requires protobuf v1.35.2 in its dependencies. The change is already aligned with the main module's requirements and other dependent modules are compatible with this version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the changelog for any breaking changes in protobuf
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf-go/v1.35.2/CHANGES.md | grep -A 10 "v1.35.2"
Length of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any protobuf-specific imports or usage
rg -l "google.golang.org/protobuf" --type go
# Check for any .proto files that might be affected
fd -e proto
# Look for any protobuf-related build or generation commands
rg -i "protoc|protobuf" -g "Makefile*" -g "*.sh"
Length of output: 2746
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check current protobuf version in versions file
cat versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION
# Look for any protobuf version-specific code or configurations
rg -i "protobuf.*1\.35\." --type go --type make
# Check go.mod in the root and other directories for protobuf dependencies
find . -name "go.mod" -exec sh -c 'echo "=== {}" && cat {}' \;
Length of output: 38364
.github/workflows/coverage.yaml (1)
57-57: Verify Codecov Action v5 compatibility
The upgrade from v4 to v5 of the Codecov action is part of the dependency updates. While this change is appropriate, being a major version bump, it's important to verify compatibility.
Let's check the Codecov action's requirements and breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
Codecov Action v5 upgrade is compatible with current setup
The workflow is properly configured for v5:
- Uses explicit token authentication which is recommended
- Not affected by the known v5 issues as it's not using tokenless uploads
- Running on Ubuntu runners (no Windows-specific issues)
- Has proper file path configuration for coverage report
- Contains appropriate error handling with continue-on-error
The upgrade from v4 to v5 is safe to proceed with the current configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Codecov action v5 compatibility and requirements
# Get the latest release information and changelog
gh api repos/codecov/codecov-action/releases/tags/v5.0.2 --jq '.body'
# Check if there are any open issues related to v5 migration
gh api search/issues -X GET -f q='repo:codecov/codecov-action is:issue label:bug v5' --jq '.items[].title'
Length of output: 567
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workflow file to understand the configuration and verify if we're using any deprecated features
# Check the workflow file content
cat .github/workflows/coverage.yaml
# Check if there are any recent issues specifically about token requirements
gh api search/issues -X GET -f q='repo:codecov/codecov-action is:issue token required' --jq '.items[].title'
# Get the latest release notes to check for breaking changes
gh api repos/codecov/codecov-action/releases/latest --jq '.body'
Length of output: 4156
go.mod (2)
428-428: LGTM: Indirect dependency updates are consistent
The updates to indirect dependencies, particularly in the Google Cloud ecosystem, are minor version bumps that maintain compatibility. The use of a specific commit hash for google.golang.org/genproto is a common practice for this package.
Also applies to: 482-482, 533-534
402-407: LGTM: Standard library and protobuf updates are coordinated
The updates to golang.org/x/* packages and google.golang.org/protobuf are coordinated and use stable versions. This is a good practice for maintaining consistency across related packages.
Let's verify the compatibility of these versions:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any known compatibility issues with the updated standard library packages
# Check for security advisories for golang.org/x packages
for pkg in "oauth2" "sync" "sys" "text" "time" "tools"; do
echo "Checking golang.org/x/$pkg"
gh api graphql -f query="
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: \"golang.org/x/$pkg\") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}"
done
# Check protobuf compatibility
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "google.golang.org/protobuf") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'Also applies to: 413-413
example/client/go.mod
Outdated
| @@ -37,6 +37,6 @@ require ( | |||
| golang.org/x/sys v0.27.0 // indirect | |||
| golang.org/x/text v0.20.0 // indirect | |||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1 // indirect | |||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241021214115-324edc3d5d38 // indirect | |||
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241104194629-dd2ea8efbc28 // indirect | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version mismatch between replace and require directives
There's a version mismatch for google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc:
- Replace directive: v0.0.0-20241113202542-65e8d215514f
- Require directive: v0.0.0-20241104194629-dd2ea8efbc28
This could lead to version resolution conflicts.
Apply this diff to align the versions:
- google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241104194629-dd2ea8efbc28 // indirect
+ google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241113202542-65e8d215514f // indirect📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241104194629-dd2ea8efbc28 // indirect | |
| google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20241113202542-65e8d215514f // indirect |
| @@ -5,15 +5,15 @@ go 1.23.3 | |||
| replace ( | |||
| cloud.google.com/go => cloud.google.com/go v0.116.0 | |||
| cloud.google.com/go/bigquery => cloud.google.com/go/bigquery v1.64.0 | |||
| cloud.google.com/go/compute => cloud.google.com/go/compute v1.28.3 | |||
| cloud.google.com/go/compute => cloud.google.com/go/compute v1.29.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The dependency updates require careful consideration due to security implications:
-
The project uses protojson.Unmarshal extensively in generated code, and google.golang.org/protobuf v1.35.2 has a known vulnerability:
- Infinite loop vulnerability in protojson.Unmarshal (moderate severity, fixed in v1.33.0)
- Multiple instances found in apis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.json.go
-
The cloud.google.com/go/compute v1.29.0 update appears safe, but should be tested thoroughly with the protobuf dependency update.
Recommendation:
- Consider updating google.golang.org/protobuf to at least v1.33.0 to address the security vulnerability
- Test the protobuf unmarshaling functionality extensively after the update
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Cloud provider SDK updates look consistent
The updates to Google Cloud and AWS SDKs are minor version bumps that should maintain backward compatibility. The coordinated updates across related packages (especially AWS SDK components) is a good practice.
Let's verify the compatibility of these versions:
Also applies to: 16-16, 50-53, 162-162
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check the specific versions being used in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any known compatibility issues or security advisories for the updated SDKs
# Check AWS SDK compatibility
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check Google Cloud SDK compatibility
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "cloud.google.com/go") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 4823
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the exact versions of cloud.google.com/go/compute and AWS SDK being used
grep -A 1 "require (" go.mod
grep "cloud.google.com/go/compute" go.mod
grep "aws-sdk-go-v2" go.mod
grep "google.golang.org/protobuf" go.mod
# Check for any direct usage of protobuf unmarshaling in the codebase
rg "protojson.Unmarshal" -A 2
Length of output: 23101
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2749 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 23.87% 23.87% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 547 547
Lines 54660 54660
==========================================
- Hits 13051 13049 -2
- Misses 40823 40824 +1
- Partials 786 787 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a953581 to
8313cd0
Compare
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| USER root:root |
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9fafd03 to
d73862d
Compare
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6aa1927 to
292a2ac
Compare
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
7 times, most recently
from
c073507 to
8abbb9f
Compare
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
from
8abbb9f to
869e55d
Compare
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
from
869e55d to
be8979f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (22)
apis/grpc/v1/agent/core/agent.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/agent/sidecar/sidecar_vtproto.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/discoverer/discoverer.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/filter/egress/egress_filter.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/filter/ingress/ingress_filter.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/meta/meta.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/mirror/mirror.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/payload/payload.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/rpc/errdetails/error_details.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/filter.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/flush.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/index.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/insert.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/object.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/remove.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/search.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/update.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goapis/grpc/v1/vald/upsert.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.goexample/client/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumrust/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (49)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md(1 hunks).github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md(1 hunks).github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/coverage.yaml(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/dev/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/example/client/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile(1 hunks)dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile(1 hunks)example/client/go.mod(2 hunks)go.mod(19 hunks)k8s/index/job/deletion/configmap.yaml(0 hunks)k8s/index/job/deletion/cronjob.yaml(0 hunks)rust/rust-toolchain(1 hunks)versions/BUF_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/CMAKE_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/GOLANGCILINT_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/HELM_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/KUBECTL_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/OPERATOR_SDK_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/RUST_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/TELEPRESENCE_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/USEARCH_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/YQ_VERSION(1 hunks)versions/actions/CODECOV_CODECOV_ACTION(1 hunks)versions/actions/GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- k8s/index/job/deletion/cronjob.yaml
- k8s/index/job/deletion/configmap.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- versions/actions/GITHUB_ISSUE_METRICS
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (45)
- versions/BUF_VERSION
- versions/USEARCH_VERSION
- versions/PROTOBUF_VERSION
- versions/GOLANGCILINT_VERSION
- rust/rust-toolchain
- versions/KUBECTL_VERSION
- versions/HELM_VERSION
- versions/actions/CODECOV_CODECOV_ACTION
- versions/TELEPRESENCE_VERSION
- versions/PROMETHEUS_STACK_VERSION
- dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile
- versions/OPERATOR_SDK_VERSION
- versions/CMAKE_VERSION
- versions/YQ_VERSION
- dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile
- dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile
- dockers/example/client/Dockerfile
- dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile
- dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile
- dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile
- versions/RUST_VERSION
- dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile
- dockers/dev/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile
- dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile
- dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile
- dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile
- dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile
- dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile
- dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile
- .github/workflows/coverage.yaml
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/security_issue_report.md
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
- example/client/go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (3)
go.mod (3)
48-69: Coordinated dependency updates look consistent
The updates to major components are well-coordinated:
- AWS SDK components are updated consistently with minor version bumps
- Google Cloud components are updated to latest versions
- Kubernetes components are aligned to v0.31.2
Also applies to: 317-321, 334-339
228-229: Testing framework updates require verification
Major updates to testing frameworks:
- Ginkgo v2.22.0
- Gomega v1.36.0
- Testify v1.10.0
Also applies to: 268-268
Line range hint 387-394: Verify monitoring stack compatibility
Significant updates to monitoring components:
- OpenTelemetry components updated to v1.32.0
- Prometheus components updated to latest versions
Also applies to: 506-509
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the monitoring configuration further to ensure compatibility.
The previous results show the basic OpenTelemetry and Prometheus usage, but I want to verify:
- OTLP exporter configuration details
- Metric configuration specifics
- Any version-specific dependencies that might cause compatibility issues
OpenTelemetry and monitoring stack updates are compatible
The verification shows:
- OpenTelemetry components are correctly configured with consistent v1.32.0 usage
- OTLP exporters are properly set up for both metrics and traces
- The gRPC requirements (v1.32.0) align with the updated dependencies
- Prometheus metric scraping configurations remain unchanged and compatible
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify monitoring configuration compatibility
# Check OpenTelemetry configuration
echo "Checking OpenTelemetry usage..."
rg "otel\." -A 3
# Check Prometheus metrics
echo "Checking Prometheus metrics..."
rg "prometheus\." -A 3
Length of output: 5243
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check OpenTelemetry configuration details
echo "Checking OpenTelemetry configuration details..."
rg "otlp" internal/observability/exporter/otlp/ -A 5
# Check metric configuration
echo "Checking metric configuration..."
rg "metric\." internal/observability/ -A 3
# Check for any potential version-specific imports or configurations
echo "Checking version-specific configurations..."
fd -e go -e yaml | xargs rg "v1\.(27|32)"
Length of output: 12075
| google.golang.org/grpc => google.golang.org/grpc v1.68.0 | ||
| google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc => google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc v1.5.1 | ||
| google.golang.org/protobuf => google.golang.org/protobuf v1.35.1 | ||
| google.golang.org/protobuf => google.golang.org/protobuf v1.35.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The update to google.golang.org/protobuf v1.35.2 still contains a known vulnerability in protojson.Unmarshal. This version is below the recommended safe version.
Please update to at least v1.33.0 to address the infinite loop vulnerability in protojson.Unmarshal.
Signed-off-by: vdaas-ci <vald@vdaas.org>
vdaas-ci
force-pushed
the
create-pull-request/patch
branch
from
be8979f to
5ab879d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated pull request to update Dependencies.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
Version Updates