Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update devdependency fake-indexeddb to v5 #322

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 13, 2023

Mend Renovate logo banner

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
fake-indexeddb ^4.0.2 -> ^5.0.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

dumbmatter/fakeIndexedDB (fake-indexeddb)

v5.0.1

Compare Source

  • #​89 - Fixed bug where ArrayBuffer views were not being correctly handled when used as keys.

  • #​88 - Added explanation to README.md about how to use fake-indexeddb v5+ with jsdom, since a structuredClone polyfill is not included anymore.

v5.0.0

Compare Source

  • Dropped support for Node.js 16, which allows me to get rid of the structuredClone polyfill, which reduces the package size by roughly 50%.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/fake-indexeddb-5.x branch from 80d773f to 7934d72 Compare November 14, 2023 16:54
@pi0 pi0 merged commit 628d053 into main Nov 14, 2023
1 of 2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/fake-indexeddb-5.x branch November 14, 2023 17:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant