You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The guidelines say that :quot should be used in modality annotation to refer from the reported event back to the reporting event. In a few examples elsewhere in the guidelines it is uppercase :QUOT, which is probably a mistake. In the Google spreadsheet with the quick reference for annotators, the Roles tab has :quot among Modal roles.
However, UMR 1.0 data always uses :quote (in all six languages) and never :quot.
What should be fixed: the documentation, or the data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dan-zeman
added a commit
to ufal/umr-guidelines
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2023
umr4nlp#22
jbonn : "Yes, there were a number of last minute changes that were made in post processing for the 1.0 release in the name of making the graphs more human-understandable. I didn't notice that this was one of them so thank you for pointing it out! All of these need to be changed in the guidelines, editor, and various lists now. (Others in this same vein included changing :modstr to :modstrength-- I think-- and changing the values to full-affirmative instead of FullAff, etc.)"
The guidelines say that
:quot
should be used in modality annotation to refer from the reported event back to the reporting event. In a few examples elsewhere in the guidelines it is uppercase:QUOT
, which is probably a mistake. In the Google spreadsheet with the quick reference for annotators, the Roles tab has:quot
among Modal roles.However, UMR 1.0 data always uses
:quote
(in all six languages) and never:quot
.What should be fixed: the documentation, or the data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: