Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve processor buckets documentation #972

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 10, 2019

Conversation

jtpalmer
Copy link
Contributor

@jtpalmer jtpalmer commented Jul 3, 2019

Description

Update processor buckets documentation to indicate that it is necessary to re-ingest the processor buckets file and re-aggregate job data after the processor buckets file is changed.

Motivation and Context

The file is documented, but the steps necessary after changing the file were missing.

https://listserv.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1907&L=CCR-XDMOD-LIST&X=8FDFD967F24AD32380&Y=jtpalmer%40buffalo.edu&P=3668

Tests performed

Manually ran the commands that are added to the documentation.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project as found in the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@jtpalmer jtpalmer added documentation Documentation updates Category:General General labels Jul 3, 2019
@jtpalmer jtpalmer added this to the 8.5.0 milestone Jul 3, 2019
@jtpalmer jtpalmer requested review from plessbd and jpwhite4 July 3, 2019 17:14
@jtpalmer jtpalmer merged commit 971dc64 into ubccr:xdmod8.5 Jul 10, 2019
@jtpalmer jtpalmer deleted the processor-buckets-docs branch November 5, 2019 13:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Category:General General documentation Documentation updates
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants