Increase size of ResourceSpecs su aggregate columns #1849
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eiffel777
added
Category:General
eiffel777
requested review from
jpwhite4,
ryanrath,
aaronweeden,
connersaeli and
aestoltm
aaronweeden
approved these changes
May 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The size needed for these columns is larger than the current setting. The ACCESS resources have values that go to 12 whole digit spaces. This increase will hold those numbers and give space for larger numbers.
The value is these columns is stored as seconds, which is why it is so large.
Tests performed
Tested on xdmod-dev. Checking the
modw_aggregates.resourcespecsfact_by_tables will show that this size is big enough to hold the values.Checklist: