More precise typechecking using vendor types #2023
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The main motivation is to provide more precise typechecking information when dealing with date & time types, because each database driver report vastly different JDBC types.
For example, in PostgreSQL the correct DB column type to store a java.time.Instant is TIMESTAMP WITH TIMEZONE (TIMESTAMPTZ). However, PostgreSQL JDBC driver reports the this column as JdbcType.Timestamp instead of JdbcType.TimestampWithTimezone. It also reports JdbcType.Timestamp for TIMESTAMP column type, which means we cannot meaningfully typecheck the query handling Instants with just JdbcType alone. The saving grace is JDBC's vendorTypeName, which Postgres correctly differentiates between TIMESTAMPTZ and TIMESTAMP.
Main changes: