Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #3206 remove references to waffle.io #3229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2019
Merged

Conversation

ssikdar1
Copy link
Contributor

A PR to fix issue #3206 and remove links to waffle.io :

Files changed based on grep:

$ grep -rnw . -e 'waffle'
./README.md:250:via [Waffle.io](https://waffle.io/typelevel/cats).
./CONTRIBUTING.md:265:via [Waffle.io](https://waffle.io/typelevel/cats).

Copy link
Contributor

@kailuowang kailuowang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 26, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3229 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3229   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.05%   93.05%           
=======================================
  Files         376      376           
  Lines        7412     7412           
  Branches      200      192    -8     
=======================================
  Hits         6897     6897           
  Misses        515      515
Flag Coverage Δ
#scala_version_212 93.38% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
#scala_version_213 92.81% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cc60c89...8c9e4a1. Read the comment docs.

@LukaJCB LukaJCB merged commit 9c571be into typelevel:master Dec 26, 2019
@travisbrown travisbrown added this to the 2.2.0-M1 milestone Jan 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants