Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update scalatestplus-scalacheck to 3.1.0.0-RC2 #3044

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

Updates org.scalatestplus:scalatestplus-scalacheck from 1.0.0-SNAP8 to 3.1.0.0-RC2.

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention @scala-steward in the comments below.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scalatestplus", artifactId = "scalatestplus-scalacheck" } ]

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 9, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3044 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3044   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.46%   93.46%           
=======================================
  Files         368      368           
  Lines        6975     6975           
  Branches      187      187           
=======================================
  Hits         6519     6519           
  Misses        456      456

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b625536...00f979c. Read the comment docs.

larsrh
larsrh previously approved these changes Sep 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants