Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CommutativeMonad for Eval #2103

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2017

Conversation

ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

@ceedubs ceedubs commented Dec 14, 2017

I believe (and the law tests seem to agree) that the existing monad
instance for Eval is a valid CommutativeMonad, so we might as well
expose it as one.

I believe (and the law tests seem to agree) that the existing monad
instance for `Eval` is a valid `CommutativeMonad`, so we might as well
expose it as one.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2103 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2103   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.79%   94.79%           
=======================================
  Files         325      325           
  Lines        5490     5490           
  Branches      214      222    +8     
=======================================
  Hits         5204     5204           
  Misses        286      286
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
core/src/main/scala/cats/Eval.scala 98.75% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 51635f8...f24e8d2. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@LukaJCB LukaJCB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :)

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit cf36426 into typelevel:master Dec 14, 2017
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Dec 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants