Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

correct type parameter seq in RWST #1765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2017
Merged

Conversation

kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #1763

@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.0.0-MF milestone Jul 12, 2017
@kailuowang kailuowang mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2017
26 tasks
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 12, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1765 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 94.11%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1765      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.17%   94.17%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         256      256              
  Lines        4208     4206       -2     
  Branches       93       97       +4     
==========================================
- Hits         3963     3961       -2     
  Misses        245      245
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rc/main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/Arbitrary.scala 92.06% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
.../src/main/scala/cats/data/ReaderWriterStateT.scala 95.78% <94.11%> (-0.09%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cb84fd4...0481156. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@peterneyens peterneyens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for picking this up @kailuowang.

@peterneyens peterneyens merged commit 8e38d9d into typelevel:master Jul 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ReaderWriterStateT type parameter order
5 participants