Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mistake in documentation of Group.remove #1566

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2017

Conversation

LukaJCB
Copy link
Member

@LukaJCB LukaJCB commented Mar 21, 2017

Documentation initially said remove was equivalent to combine(a, inverse(a)). Changed to be equivalent to combine(a, inverse(b)) instead.

Documentation initially said `remove` was equivalent to `combine(a, inverse(a))`. Changed to be equivalent to `combine(a, inverse(b))` instead.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 21, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1566 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1566   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.34%   92.34%           
=======================================
  Files         247      247           
  Lines        3904     3904           
  Branches      131      131           
=======================================
  Hits         3605     3605           
  Misses        299      299
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
kernel/src/main/scala/cats/kernel/Group.scala 42.85% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8fbf546...91eb2ef. Read the comment docs.

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit df0b9ab into typelevel:master Mar 21, 2017
@LukaJCB LukaJCB deleted the patch-1 branch March 21, 2017 13:25
@kailuowang kailuowang modified the milestone: 1.0.0-MF Apr 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants