refactor(ci): improve github workflows #270
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request encompasses multiple minor modifications across various GitHub workflow and configuration files. The changes primarily involve standardizing string quotation (from single to double quotes), adding newline characters at file endings, and making small configuration adjustments. These updates focus on maintaining consistent formatting and improving workflow configurations without introducing significant functional changes to the repository's CI/CD and contribution processes. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Repo as GitHub Repository
participant Workflows as GitHub Actions
participant Dependabot
participant PublishService as Pub.dev
Repo->>Workflows: Trigger workflows
Workflows->>Dependabot: Monitor dependencies
Dependabot-->>Repo: Update dependency suggestions
Workflows->>PublishService: Publish packages conditionally
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
.github/workflows/publish_sealed_currencies.yaml (1)
Line range hint
7-17: Consider documenting the workflow structure.While the changes are consistent and correct, consider adding documentation about the common workflow structure and versioning pattern used across these files.
Add a comment block at the top of each workflow file explaining:
name: publish_sealed_currencies +# This workflow publishes the sealed_currencies package to pub.dev when a new version tag is pushed. +# Tag format: sealed_currencies-v[major].[minor].[patch] +# The workflow inherits the common publishing configuration from publish_to_pub.yaml on: push:.github/workflows/backup.yaml (1)
Line range hint
13-14: Consider using major version tag for actionsWhile pinning to specific versions (
v4.2.2) provides stability, using major version tags (v4) would automatically receive security updates while maintaining compatibility.- uses: actions/checkout@v4.2.2 + uses: actions/checkout@v4.github/workflows/stale.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM! Well-configured stale issue managementThe workflow is well configured with:
- Appropriate timeframes (60 days before stale, 14 days before close)
- Clear and informative messages
- Proper permissions
Consider adding a step to track stale metrics over time using GitHub's REST API. This could help tune the stale/close timeframes based on actual project activity patterns.
Example metrics to track:
- Number of issues/PRs marked as stale
- Resolution rate (closed vs reactivated)
- Average time to resolution
.github/workflows/verify_package_workflow.yaml (1)
Line range hint
109-113: LGTM! Correct parameter name for codecov-action.The change from
filetofilesaligns with the correct parameter name for codecov-action@v5.1.2.Consider using a more specific format for the flags parameter to better identify the coverage report in Codecov:
- flags: ${{ inputs.package_name }} + flags: dart_${{ inputs.package_name }}This helps distinguish between different language implementations if you add more in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.github/code_of_conduct.md(2 hunks).github/contributing.md(1 hunks).github/dependabot.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/backup.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/config/auto-assign.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/publish_sealed_countries.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish_sealed_currencies.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish_sealed_languages.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/publish_world_countries.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/publish_world_flags.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/pull_request.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/stale.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/verify_package_workflow.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/code_of_conduct.md
[style] ~32-~32: Try using a synonym here to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ind - Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks - Pu...
(COMMENT_REMARK)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/workflows/publish_world_flags.yaml (1)
6-7: LGTM! Tag pattern follows best practices
The tag pattern is well-structured and specific, following the format world_flags-v[0-9]+.[0-9]+.[0-9]+*. This ensures proper versioning control.
.github/workflows/publish_sealed_languages.yaml (3)
Line range hint 11-11: Remove redundant condition
Similar to the previous workflow, the condition if: github.ref_type == 'tag' is redundant and can be removed.
6-7: LGTM! Consistent tag pattern
The tag pattern follows the same structured format as other workflows, maintaining consistency across the repository.
Line range hint 12-12: Verify reusable workflow existence
The workflow uses a reusable workflow from ./.github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml. Let's verify its existence and accessibility.
✅ Verification successful
Reusable workflow exists and is properly configured
The verification confirms that:
- The workflow file
.github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yamlexists - It's properly configured as a reusable workflow (contains
workflow_call:declaration)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the reusable workflow
if [ -f .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml ]; then
echo "Reusable workflow exists"
# Check if it's properly configured as a reusable workflow
grep -l "workflow_call:" .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml
else
echo "Error: Reusable workflow not found"
exit 1
fi
Length of output: 210
.github/workflows/publish_sealed_countries.yaml (2)
7-7: LGTM! Tag pattern follows YAML best practices.
The change to double quotes for the tag pattern is appropriate, as it's the preferred style in YAML for strings containing special characters.
Line range hint 11-17: Verify the reusable workflow implementation.
The workflow configuration looks good with proper conditional execution and permissions. Let's verify the referenced reusable workflow.
✅ Verification successful
Reusable workflow implementation verified and found to be well-structured
The reusable workflow publish_to_pub.yaml is properly implemented with:
- Required inputs for
package_nameandtag - Comprehensive version checks across pubspec.yaml and CHANGELOG.md
- Proper security measures with conditional execution based on repository owner
- Consistent usage across multiple package workflows:
- sealed_countries
- sealed_languages
- world_countries
- world_flags
- sealed_currencies
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the reusable workflow and its usage
# Check if the reusable workflow exists and examine its content
if [ -f .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml ]; then
echo "Reusable workflow found. Content:"
cat .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml
else
echo "Warning: Referenced workflow .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml not found"
fi
# Check for consistent usage across other workflow files
echo "Checking usage patterns across workflows:"
rg "uses: \\./.github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 3347
.github/workflows/publish_world_countries.yaml (1)
7-7: LGTM! Consistent with other workflows.
The changes maintain consistency with other workflow files:
- Double quotes for tag pattern
- Proper conditional execution for tags
Also applies to: 11-11
.github/workflows/backup.yaml (1)
Line range hint 19-24: LGTM! Secure configuration for GitLab mirroring
The workflow is well configured with:
- Appropriate timeout limits
- Secure secret handling for SSH key
- Specific version pinning for the mirroring action
.github/workflows/stale.yaml (1)
24-25: LGTM! Secure token usage
Properly uses GITHUB_TOKEN secret for authentication.
.github/workflows/pull_request.yaml (1)
30-30: LGTM! Quote standardization change.
The change from single to double quotes is consistent with the standardization effort and doesn't affect functionality.
.github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml (1)
76-77: LGTM! Quote standardization changes.
The changes from single to double quotes maintain consistency and don't affect the publishing workflow's functionality.
.github/contributing.md (1)
43-43: LGTM! Markdown emphasis standardization.
The changes from asterisks to underscores for emphasis maintain Markdown compatibility while standardizing the emphasis style across documentation.
Also applies to: 48-48
.github/code_of_conduct.md (1)
20-25: LGTM! Improved clarity and completeness of the Code of Conduct.
The changes enhance the document by:
- Adding important context about learning from mistakes
- Clarifying the requirement for explicit permission regarding private information
- Improving formatting consistency
Also applies to: 30-36, 109-110
Description
Type of Change
Checks
Please look at the following checklist to ensure that your PR can be accepted quickly:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Documentation