Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): remove old dart code linter reference and bump dcm/lints #269

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

tsinis
Copy link
Owner

@tsinis tsinis commented Dec 26, 2024

Description

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • πŸ› οΈ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • πŸ§ͺ Tests
  • πŸ“ Documentation
  • βš™οΈ CI/CD or GitHub Workflow configuration change
  • πŸ“¦ Dependencies update

Checks

Please look at the following checklist to ensure that your PR can be accepted quickly:

  • Data come from open-source resources with MIT License (if presented).
  • New code is documented and the data source is referenced (if presented).
  • Existing tests are up to date with these changes.
  • New code is fully tested (if presented).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced analysis capabilities with updated linting and metrics rules across various packages.
    • New factory methods added to the Script class for improved instance creation.
    • New badges and links added to README files for better accessibility to project metrics.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of null checks and parameter validations in several classes.
  • Documentation

    • Added comments for clarity in multiple classes and methods to improve understanding of code intent.
    • Updated badge descriptions in README files to ensure consistency and clarity.
  • Chores

    • Updated various dependency versions across multiple packages to ensure compatibility with the latest Dart and Flutter SDKs.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

πŸ“ Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request encompasses a comprehensive set of updates across multiple packages and configuration files. The changes primarily focus on updating dependency versions, refining code analysis configurations, and making minor improvements to code clarity and documentation. Key areas of modification include SDK and package version upgrades, adjustments to linting and metrics rules, and subtle refinements in code structure across various components of the project.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
.vscode/sealed_world.code-workspace Updated Dart Code Metrics tasks to use simplified dcm command
packages/_sealed_world_tests/pubspec.yaml Updated SDK, test, and dev dependencies to newer versions
packages/analysis_options.yaml Modified Dart Code Metrics configuration and linter rules
packages/flutter_analysis_options.yaml Added numerous new Flutter-specific linting rules
packages/sealed_countries/lib/src/model/country/submodels/world_country.dart Added comment to fromCodeNumeric factory method
packages/sealed_countries/pubspec.yaml Updated dev dependencies
packages/sealed_currencies/pubspec.yaml Updated dev dependencies
packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/helpers/extensions/iso_standardized_string_extension.dart Minor formatting changes in method implementations
packages/sealed_languages/pubspec.yaml Updated dev dependencies
packages/world_countries/example/pubspec.yaml Updated SDK and Flutter versions
packages/world_countries/pubspec.yaml Updated dev dependencies and incremented version
packages/world_flags/pubspec.yaml Updated Dart Code Metrics and lints dependencies
tools/analysis_options.yaml Renamed dart_code_linter section to dart_code_metrics
tools/pubspec.yaml Updated SDK and various package dependencies

Sequence Diagram

Since the changes are primarily configuration and dependency updates, a sequence diagram would not provide meaningful insights into the modifications.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions[bot]
github-actions bot previously approved these changes Dec 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 11

πŸ”­ Outside diff range comments (3)
tools/lib/utils/json_utils.dart (1)

Line range hint 267-278: Consider clarifying the logic for assigning countryCode and scriptCode.

This segment uses nested ternary operations and variable reassignments that can be confusing and potentially error-prone. For instance, countryCode is first set to match?.group(3), then scriptCode is conditionally set based on that value, and finally, countryCode is reassigned based on scriptCode. This makes the logic difficult to follow and creates a risk of mixing up β€œcountry” vs. β€œscript” when reading or maintaining the code.

You can simplify by clearly separating and naming steps for extracting and reassigning these values, rather than reusing the same variable names for different purposes. For improved readability, consider an approach similar to:

({String? countryCode, String languageCode, String? scriptCode})
_extractLocaleCode(String code) {
  final regex = RegExp("^([A-Z]+)(?:_([A-Z]+))?(?:_([A-Z]+))?");
  final match = regex.firstMatch(code.toUpperCase());

  final lang = match?.group(1) ?? "";
- final country = match?.group(2);
- String? countryCode = match?.group(3);
- String? scriptCode = countryCode == null ? null : country;
- countryCode = scriptCode == null ? country : countryCode;
+ final extractedCountry = match?.group(2);
+ final extractedScriptOrCountry = match?.group(3);

+ String? resolvedScriptCode;
+ String? resolvedCountryCode;

+ if (extractedScriptOrCountry == null) {
+   resolvedScriptCode = null;
+   resolvedCountryCode = extractedCountry;
+ } else {
+   // e.g. "en_US_Latn" => extractedCountry == "US", extractedScriptOrCountry == "LATN"
+   resolvedScriptCode = extractedScriptOrCountry.length == 4 ? extractedScriptOrCountry : extractedCountry;
+   resolvedCountryCode = extractedScriptOrCountry.length == 4 ? null : extractedScriptOrCountry;
+ }

  // Ensure countryCode is not empty
- countryCode = (countryCode?.isEmpty ?? true) ? null : countryCode;
- if (countryCode?.length == 4) {
-   scriptCode = countryCode;
-   countryCode = null;
- }
+ resolvedCountryCode = (resolvedCountryCode?.isEmpty ?? true) ? null : resolvedCountryCode;

  return (
    languageCode: lang,
-   countryCode: countryCode,
-   scriptCode: scriptCode,
+   countryCode: resolvedCountryCode,
+   scriptCode: resolvedScriptCode,
  );
}
packages/world_countries/pubspec.yaml (1)

SDK constraints need to be lowered to match other packages

The package's SDK constraints (Dart SDK ^3.3.0 and Flutter >=3.19.0) are higher than necessary based on the analysis of other packages in the repository:

  • Most packages use either:
    • Dart SDK ^3.0.0 (sealed_countries, sealed_currencies, sealed_languages, world_flags)
    • Dart SDK ^3.6.0 (tools, examples)
  • The world_flags package, which is similar in nature, uses Flutter ">=3.10.0"

Recommendation: Consider lowering the constraints to match other packages:

  • Dart SDK: ^3.0.0 (to align with other main packages)
  • Flutter: ">=3.10.0" (to match world_flags package)

This would maintain consistency across the project and avoid unnecessarily restricting users to newer versions when the functionality likely works with older versions.

πŸ”— Analysis chain

Line range hint 36-37: Verify SDK and Flutter version constraints.

The package requires Dart SDK ^3.3.0 and Flutter >=3.19.0, which are relatively high version constraints. Please ensure these versions align with the project's minimum supported versions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Flutter/Dart SDK constraints across the project

echo "Checking SDK constraints across all packages..."
fd -e yaml pubspec.yaml | xargs awk '/sdk:/ || /flutter:/' 2>/dev/null

echo "Checking Flutter version in pubspec.lock files..."
fd -e lock pubspec.lock | xargs grep -A 1 '"flutter"' 2>/dev/null

Length of output: 779


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's get a clearer view of SDK constraints by examining each pubspec.yaml individually

echo "=== Examining individual pubspec.yaml files ==="
for file in $(fd -e yaml pubspec.yaml); do
  echo -e "\nFile: $file"
  echo "----------------------------------------"
  cat "$file" | grep -A 2 "environment:" || true
  echo "----------------------------------------"
done

Length of output: 3971

packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/pickers/basic_picker_state.dart (1)

Line range hint 46-57: Consider simplifying the nested conditional expression.

While the theme fallback implementation is correct, the nested conditional expression could be simplified for better readability.

Consider extracting the header logic to a separate method or using a more declarative approach:

-      header: (widget.showHeader ?? theme?.showHeader ?? true)
-          ? (widget.header ??
-              theme?.header ??
-              AdaptiveSearchTextField(
-                _controller,
-                copyFrom: widget.searchBar ?? theme?.searchBar,
-                padding: widget.searchBarPadding ??
-                    theme?.searchBarPadding ??
-                    UiConstants.padding,
-                showClearButton:
-                    widget.showClearButton ?? theme?.showClearButton ?? true,
-              ))
-          : null,
+      header: _buildHeader(theme),

And add a new method:

Widget? _buildHeader(PickerThemeData? theme) {
  if (!(widget.showHeader ?? theme?.showHeader ?? true)) return null;
  
  return widget.header ?? theme?.header ?? AdaptiveSearchTextField(
    _controller,
    copyFrom: widget.searchBar ?? theme?.searchBar,
    padding: widget.searchBarPadding ?? theme?.searchBarPadding ?? UiConstants.padding,
    showClearButton: widget.showClearButton ?? theme?.showClearButton ?? true,
  );
}
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e91c3a and 48e5429.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • packages/world_countries/example/pubspec.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • packages/world_flags/example/pubspec.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (39)
  • .vscode/sealed_world.code-workspace (1 hunks)
  • packages/_sealed_world_tests/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/analysis_options.yaml (6 hunks)
  • packages/flutter_analysis_options.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_countries/lib/src/model/country/submodels/world_country.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_countries/lib/src/model/regional_bloc/regional_bloc.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_countries/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_currencies/lib/src/model/currency/submodels/fiat_currency.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_currencies/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/helpers/extensions/iso_standardized_string_extension.dart (2 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/model/language/submodels/natural_language.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/model/language_family/submodels/natural_language_family.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/model/script/submodels/script.dart (2 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_languages/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/example/lib/routing/delegate.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/example/lib/theme/theme_manager.dart (0 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/example/lib/theme/theme_provider.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/example/lib/widgets/description_tile.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/example/lib/widgets/tab_body.dart (2 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/example/pubspec.yaml (2 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/extensions/typed_locale_extension.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/interfaces/indexed_list_view_interface.dart (0 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/country/country_picker.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/currency/currency_picker.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/language/language_picker.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/phone_code/phone_code_picker.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/pickers/basic_picker.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/pickers/basic_picker_state.dart (2 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/example/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/lib/src/model/typedefs.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/lib/src/ui/country_flag.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/lib/src/ui/flags/basic_flag.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/lib/src/ui/painters/custom/taegukgi_painter.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/pubspec.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tools/analysis_options.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tools/lib/utils/args_parser.dart (1 hunks)
  • tools/lib/utils/json_utils.dart (2 hunks)
  • tools/pubspec.yaml (2 hunks)
πŸ’€ Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • packages/world_countries/example/lib/theme/theme_manager.dart
  • packages/world_countries/lib/src/interfaces/indexed_list_view_interface.dart
🧰 Additional context used
πŸ““ Learnings (2)
packages/sealed_currencies/pubspec.yaml (1)
Learnt from: tsinis
PR: tsinis/sealed_world#237
File: packages/sealed_countries/pubspec.yaml:24-24
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T12:26:43.241Z
Learning: `sealed_currencies` version 1.5.1 does not introduce any breaking changes.
packages/sealed_countries/pubspec.yaml (1)
Learnt from: tsinis
PR: tsinis/sealed_world#237
File: packages/sealed_countries/pubspec.yaml:24-24
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T12:26:43.241Z
Learning: `sealed_currencies` version 1.5.1 does not introduce any breaking changes.
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (35)
packages/world_flags/lib/src/ui/flags/basic_flag.dart (1)

82-82: LGTM! The parentheses addition improves code clarity.

The addition of parentheses around (ratio ?? _flagAspectRatio) makes the order of operations more explicit without changing the behavior. This is a good practice for improving code readability.

packages/world_flags/lib/src/ui/country_flag.dart (1)

62-62: Documentation alignment confirmed.

Renaming the documentation parameter to alternativeMap brings it into line with the actual constructor parameter name, improving clarity. No issues detected.

tools/pubspec.yaml (3)

12-13: LGTM: Safe patch version updates

The version bumps for collection, path, and yaml packages are patch updates, which typically contain bug fixes and minor improvements without breaking changes.

Also applies to: 19-19


Line range hint 1-29: Verify analysis options after linter removal

The removal of dart_code_linter is noted. To ensure code quality is maintained:

  1. Confirm that all previously enforced rules are covered by dart_code_metrics_presets
  2. Update any analysis options files that referenced the removed linter
βœ… Verification successful

Removal of dart_code_linter is safe as rules are covered by dart_code_metrics_presets

The verification shows that:

  1. The project uses dart_code_metrics_presets/dart_all.yaml which provides comprehensive linting coverage
  2. The analysis options files have extensive rule configurations using dart_code_metrics and standard linter rules
  3. No direct references to the removed dart_code_linter package were found in the analysis options files
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check analysis options files for potential updates needed

echo "Checking analysis_options.yaml files for potential updates:"
fd "analysis_options.yaml" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 25037


28-29: Verify metrics configuration after linter removal

The update to dart_code_metrics_presets (^2.17.0 -> ^2.19.0) and removal of dart_code_linter suggests a consolidation of code analysis tools. Please ensure that all necessary linting rules are covered by the metrics presets.

βœ… Verification successful

Let me check the content of these analysis options files to verify the linting configuration.


Linting rules are properly configured after dart_code_linter removal

The analysis of the configuration files shows that all necessary linting rules are properly covered by dart_code_metrics_presets. The package extends dart_code_metrics_presets/dart_all.yaml and has comprehensive configuration for both general Dart rules and Flutter-specific rules. No references to dart_code_linter were found in the codebase, and the metrics configuration is well-maintained with:

  • Proper extension of presets
  • Detailed rule configurations
  • Clear separation between Flutter and Dart rules
  • Explicit enable/disable flags for specific rules with documented reasons
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to dart_code_linter
# and verify metrics configuration files

echo "Checking for dart_code_linter references:"
rg "dart_code_linter"

echo -e "\nChecking for metrics configuration files:"
fd "analysis_options|metrics" --type f

Length of output: 548


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of analysis options files
echo "Content of tools/analysis_options.yaml:"
cat tools/analysis_options.yaml

echo -e "\nContent of packages/analysis_options.yaml:"
cat packages/analysis_options.yaml

echo -e "\nContent of packages/flutter_analysis_options.yaml:"
cat packages/flutter_analysis_options.yaml

Length of output: 25002

packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/currency/currency_picker.dart (1)

74-77: Enhanced clarity with explicit parentheses

Using (isDense ?? false) improves readability and ensures the logic is unambiguous. This change appears consistent and correct.

packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/language/language_picker.dart (1)

74-77: Consistent use of parentheses for clarity

Adding parentheses around (isDense ?? false) makes the conditional check more explicit, maintaining consistency across similar picker widgets.

packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/country/country_picker.dart (1)

117-117: Improved conditional readability

Wrapping the isDense null-check in parentheses is a welcome consistency improvement, aligning this picker with the others.

packages/world_countries/lib/src/widgets/phone_code/phone_code_picker.dart (1)

154-157: Refined conditional checks for better readability

Applying parentheses around (isDense ?? false) for both onPressed and visualDensity echoes the pattern used in other pickers, ensuring uniform clarity everywhere.

packages/world_countries/example/lib/theme/theme_provider.dart (1)

25-26: Ensure the new color method behaves as expected.

Replacing withOpacity with withValues(alpha: 1) is consistent with the new approach to color manipulation. Confirm that all references to this theme return the intended color opacity and that calling code is unaffected.

packages/world_flags/lib/src/model/typedefs.dart (1)

41-43: Documentation updates look good.

The improved formatting and clarity in the documentation for FlagParentBounds help developers understand the record’s fields better. No further changes needed.

Also applies to: 47-47

packages/world_countries/example/lib/widgets/description_tile.dart (1)

49-49: Consistent alpha setting approach.

Switching from withOpacity(0.1) to withValues(alpha: 0.1) aligns with the refactoring throughout the codebase. Good job maintaining a uniform color strategy.

packages/world_countries/lib/src/extensions/typed_locale_extension.dart (1)

95-96: Check for potential breaking changes in tuple ordering.

Reordering currencies and languages in the returned record might cause mismatches in code expecting a specific field order. Ensure downstream consumers correctly reference the changed field order.

packages/sealed_countries/lib/src/model/regional_bloc/regional_bloc.dart (1)

43-43: Use of ignore comment is acceptable.

Marking this constructor as an exception to the lint rule is reasonable here, as it clarifies the implementation intent for a factory constructor. No further changes are required.

.vscode/sealed_world.code-workspace (5)

262-262: Command update aligned with removing old code linter references.

Switching from the verbose dart_code_linter:metrics command to dcm makes the workflow simpler and consistent with the PR objectives.


267-267: Ensure that dcm check-unnecessary-nullable is recognized in your environment.

Please verify that your updated version of dcm supports the check-unnecessary-nullable subcommand to avoid breakage in CI tasks.


272-272: Streamlined lint command.

Using dcm check-unused-l10n is more concise. Ensure that project scripts or documentation referencing the old command are updated accordingly.


277-277: Confirm no custom logic relies on the old metrics check-unused-files.

While this update is straightforward, confirm there are no additional parameters or environment setups required for the new command to function as intended.


282-282: Unused code check command updated.

Switching to dcm check-unused-code is consistent. No immediate issues found.

packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/model/script/submodels/script.dart (2)

55-55: Factory constructor usage is clear and justified.

Continuing to ignore lint rules for non-empty constructor bodies in factory methods is understandable, as it clarifies the usage for code readers. No further changes needed.


105-105: Factory constructor doc is consistent with usage.

The comment explains the intent of ignoring non-empty constructor bodies for clarity in factory methods. This is acceptable.

tools/analysis_options.yaml (1)

8-11: Verify the migration from dart_code_linter to dart_code_metrics

The section rename from dart_code_linter to dart_code_metrics looks good. Let's verify that all related configurations are updated consistently.

βœ… Verification successful

Let me check the actual content of these files to verify the migration is complete and consistent.


Migration to dart_code_metrics is complete and consistent

The verification shows that the migration from dart_code_linter to dart_code_metrics is complete. All relevant files are using the new dart_code_metrics configuration consistently:

  • Configuration files (analysis_options.yaml) properly use the dart_code_metrics section
  • Dependencies in pubspec.yaml files correctly reference dart_code_metrics_presets
  • No remaining references to dart_code_linter were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to dart_code_linter
rg -l "dart_code_linter" --type yaml

# Check for consistent usage of dart_code_metrics
rg -l "dart_code_metrics" --type yaml

Length of output: 511


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of yaml files for dart_code_metrics configuration
rg "dart_code_\w+" -B1 -A3 --type yaml

Length of output: 3680

packages/world_flags/example/pubspec.yaml (1)

8-9: Verify SDK version compatibility across dependencies

The SDK version updates look appropriate. However, let's ensure all dependencies are compatible with Dart 3.6.0 and Flutter 3.27.1.

βœ… Verification successful

SDK version constraints are compatible across the project

The verification shows that all packages in the repository use Dart SDK version constraints that are compatible with the updated version ^3.6.0:

  • Most packages use either ^3.0.0, ^3.3.0, or ^3.6.0
  • The lower bounds (^3.0.0) are compatible with the upper version (^3.6.0)
  • Flutter version ^3.27.1 is compatible with these Dart SDK versions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for SDK constraints in all pubspec files
fd pubspec.yaml | xargs awk '/sdk:|flutter:/ && /\^3\./{print FILENAME ":" FNR ":" $0}'

# Check for potential version conflicts
fd pubspec.yaml | xargs grep -l "sdk:" | xargs cat | grep "^  sdk:"

Length of output: 902

packages/_sealed_world_tests/pubspec.yaml (1)

14-14: LGTM: Dependencies updated to latest stable versions

All dependency updates are minor/patch version bumps:

  • test: ^1.25.7 -> ^1.25.8
  • dart_code_metrics_presets: ^2.17.0 -> ^2.19.0
  • lints: ^5.0.0 -> ^5.1.1

These updates maintain backward compatibility while incorporating the latest improvements.

Also applies to: 18-19

packages/sealed_languages/pubspec.yaml (1)

26-30: LGTM: Dev dependencies updated consistently

All updates are to development dependencies and maintain backward compatibility:

  • Minor version bumps: coverage (1.9 -> 1.11)
  • Patch version bumps: build_runner, dart_code_metrics_presets, lints, test

The updates align with the changes in _sealed_world_tests package.

packages/world_flags/pubspec.yaml (1)

27-27: LGTM: Consistent dependency updates across packages

The dev dependency updates align with changes in other packages:

  • dart_code_metrics_presets: ^2.19.0
  • lints: ^5.1.1

Also applies to: 31-31

βœ… Verification successful

Dependency versions are consistent across all packages

The verification confirms that all packages in the repository use consistent versions:

  • dart_code_metrics_presets: ^2.19.0 in all packages including tools
  • lints: ^5.1.1 in all packages with the same comment "# From Google"
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify consistency of these dependencies across all packages
echo "Checking dart_code_metrics_presets versions:"
fd -e yaml pubspec.yaml -x grep -H "dart_code_metrics_presets:" {}
echo -e "\nChecking lints versions:"
fd -e yaml pubspec.yaml -x grep -H "lints:" {}

Length of output: 1547

packages/sealed_countries/pubspec.yaml (1)

29-33: LGTM! Dev dependency updates look safe.

All updates are minor version bumps following semantic versioning, maintaining backward compatibility. The changes align with the PR objective of updating dependencies.

Let's verify these versions are the latest stable releases:

βœ… Verification successful

Let me try a different approach using the Dart pub API to check the package versions.


βœ… All dev dependencies are up-to-date with the latest stable versions

Verification confirms that all package versions in pubspec.yaml match the latest stable versions from pub.dev:

  • build_runner: ^2.4.14 matches latest 2.4.14
  • coverage: ^1.11.1 matches latest 1.11.1
  • dart_code_metrics_presets: ^2.19.0 matches latest 2.19.0
  • lints: ^5.1.1 matches latest 5.1.1
  • test: ^1.25.14 matches latest 1.25.14
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify latest stable versions of dev dependencies
# Note: Using GitHub API to check the latest releases

for package in "build_runner" "coverage" "dart_code_metrics_presets" "lints" "test"; do
  echo "Checking $package..."
  gh api graphql -f query='{
    repository(owner: "dart-lang", name: "'$package'") {
      releases(last: 1) {
        nodes {
          tagName
          isPrerelease
        }
      }
    }
  }'
done

Length of output: 2529


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest versions using pub.dev API
for package in "build_runner" "coverage" "dart_code_metrics_presets" "lints" "test"; do
  echo "Checking $package..."
  curl -s "https://pub.dev/api/packages/$package" | jq -r '.latest.version'
done

Length of output: 1121

packages/sealed_currencies/pubspec.yaml (1)

29-33: LGTM! Consistent with sealed_countries package.

The dev dependency updates mirror those in the sealed_countries package, maintaining consistency across the project.

packages/world_countries/pubspec.yaml (1)

44-45: LGTM! Dev dependency updates align with other packages.

The updates maintain consistency with other packages in the project.

Also applies to: 49-49

packages/world_countries/example/lib/routing/delegate.dart (1)

23-23: LGTM: Well-documented lint ignore.

The added ignore comment is appropriate and well-documented, explaining that the non-empty constructor body comes from the original Google code. This maintains consistency with the source code while acknowledging the lint rule.

packages/world_countries/example/lib/widgets/tab_body.dart (1)

29-30: LGTM: More explicit color opacity handling.

The change from withOpacity to withValues(alpha:) makes the code more explicit about which color component is being modified. Both methods achieve the same result, and the new approach aligns better with modern Dart practices.

Also applies to: 58-59

packages/flutter_analysis_options.yaml (1)

11-18: LGTM! Widget-specific rules are well configured.

The configuration for widget-related rules is appropriate:

  • avoid-returning-widgets with allow-nullable: true helps prevent widget tree rebuilds while allowing null returns
  • prefer-widget-private-members with ignore-static: true promotes encapsulation while allowing static utility methods
packages/world_flags/lib/src/ui/painters/custom/taegukgi_painter.dart (1)

120-120: LGTM! Well-documented lint ignore.

The ignore comment for prefer-for-in is appropriate and well-documented, as the index is needed for calculations in the loop.

packages/sealed_languages/lib/src/helpers/extensions/iso_standardized_string_extension.dart (2)

111-118: LGTM! Code readability improvements.

The changes enhance code clarity by adding parentheses around conditions and callback invocations while maintaining the same functionality.


130-131: LGTM! Consistent callback invocation formatting.

The changes maintain consistent formatting with parentheses around callback invocations, aligning with the codebase style.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48e5429 and 2329c20.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/world_flags/test/goldens/simplified/mda.png is excluded by !**/*.png
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (13)
  • .github/readme.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish_world_countries.yaml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish_world_flags.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .vscode/sealed_world.code-workspace (2 hunks)
  • packages/_sealed_world_tests/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_countries/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_currencies/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/sealed_languages/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_countries/README.md (2 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/README.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/lib/src/model/elements/elements_properties.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/test/src/model/colors_properties_test.dart (1 hunks)
  • packages/world_flags/test/src/model/elements/elements_properties_test.dart (1 hunks)
πŸ’€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish_world_countries.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
πŸ““ Learnings (1)
packages/sealed_languages/README.md (1)
Learnt from: tsinis
PR: tsinis/sealed_world#235
File: packages/sealed_languages/README.md:3-4
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T12:26:43.241Z
Learning: In the README files, badges like CodeFactor and Codecov are implicit and not manually created. Do not suggest updating them for consistency.
πŸͺ› Markdownlint (0.37.0)
.github/readme.md

14-14: Element: a
Inline HTML

(MD033, no-inline-html)


15-15: Element: img
Inline HTML

(MD033, no-inline-html)

packages/world_countries/README.md

52-52: Element: a
Inline HTML

(MD033, no-inline-html)


53-53: Element: img
Inline HTML

(MD033, no-inline-html)

πŸͺ› yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/publish_world_flags.yaml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 7-7: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 16-16: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

πŸ”‡ Additional comments (17)
.vscode/sealed_world.code-workspace (6)

3-6: Verify folder path correctness

The path has changed from "../.vscode" to ".". Ensure that project references, settings, and any dependencies still point to the correct folder after this change.


268-268: Simplify linting command

Switching from dart run dart_code_linter:metrics analyze lib to dcm analyze lib makes the lint command more concise and aligns with the new dcm package usage. This looks good.


273-273: Command update for unnecessary nullable check

Changing to dcm check-unnecessary-nullable lib is consistent with the new, shorter command usage. Nice improvement.


278-278: Refined command for checking unused l10n

Using dcm check-unused-l10n lib is succinct and standardized across metrics commands.


283-283: Simplify checking for unused files

Improving the command to dcm check-unused-files lib is consistent with the updated metrics approach.


288-288: New command for checking unused code

Rewriting the command to dcm check-unused-code lib ensures consistency with the new tools. Straightforward change.

packages/_sealed_world_tests/README.md (1)

5-6: LGTM! Badge improvements enhance documentation accessibility.

The addition of hyperlinks to the badges improves user experience by providing direct access to relevant GitHub pages.

.github/readme.md (2)

5-6: LGTM! Enhanced badge accessibility.

The addition of hyperlinks to the badges improves user experience by providing direct access to relevant GitHub pages.


13-15: LGTM! Development environment badges enhance developer onboarding.

The addition of Codespaces and IDX badges provides quick access to development environments. The use of inline HTML for the IDX badge is justified as it requires specific styling that cannot be achieved with standard Markdown.

🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› Markdownlint (0.37.0)

14-14: Element: a
Inline HTML

(MD033, no-inline-html)


15-15: Element: img
Inline HTML

(MD033, no-inline-html)

packages/world_flags/README.md (1)

6-8: LGTM! Badge improvements enhance package metrics visibility.

The addition of hyperlinks to the badges improves user experience by providing direct access to package metrics and repository information.

packages/sealed_languages/README.md (1)

6-9: LGTM: Badge updates look good!

The badge links are properly formatted and point to the correct resources.

packages/sealed_currencies/README.md (1)

6-9: LGTM: Badge updates look good!

The badge links are properly formatted and point to the correct resources.

packages/world_countries/README.md (1)

6-9: LGTM: Badge updates look good!

The badge links are properly formatted and point to the correct resources.

packages/sealed_countries/README.md (1)

6-9: LGTM! Documentation improvements.

The changes enhance the README by making the badges clickable, providing direct access to relevant metrics and resources. This improves the documentation's usability by allowing users to easily access:

  • Package scoring on pub.dev
  • Latest commit information
  • Package popularity metrics
  • GitHub repository stars
.github/workflows/publish_world_flags.yaml (2)

10-16: LGTM! Secure job configuration.

The job configuration follows security best practices:

  • Uses local workflow reference
  • Follows principle of least privilege with minimal permissions
  • Correctly passes required parameters
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 16-16: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)


11-11: Verify the reused workflow configuration.

Let's verify the existence and configuration of the reused workflow file.

βœ… Verification successful

Reused workflow configuration is properly set up

The reused workflow file .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml exists and is well-configured with:

  • Required inputs: package_name and tag
  • Proper version checking across pubspec.yaml, CHANGELOG.md, and git tag
  • Safety checks to ensure versions match before publishing
  • Appropriate publishing configuration using the official Dart workflow
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the reused workflow file exists and check its configuration

# Check if the workflow file exists and show its contents
if [[ -f .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml ]]; then
  echo "Workflow file exists. Contents:"
  cat .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml
else
  echo "Warning: Referenced workflow file .github/workflows/publish_to_pub.yaml does not exist"
fi

Length of output: 2690

packages/world_flags/test/src/model/colors_properties_test.dart (1)

15-17: Confirm string representation stability.

The updated test string is now more explicit about the color properties, which can be helpful but may vary if Flutter's Color or MaterialColor implementations change their toString() output in future versions. Consider a more robust approach (for example, verifying only the essential parts of the color representation) to reduce potential false positives in testing.

Below is a shell script that searches for other exact expectations of Color(...) or MaterialColor(...) in the tests, ensuring they match your new format:

@tsinis tsinis merged commit c8b2673 into main Dec 26, 2024
18 checks passed
@tsinis tsinis deleted the refactor/update-lints branch December 26, 2024 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant