chore(mongoose): improve mongoose model index options type

[abenerd]

Information

Type	Breaking change
Chore	No

---

We know the shape that the index options should take, therefore we can specify it here.

Todos

• Tests
• Coverage
• Example
• Documentation

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Enhanced type specificity in the database schema options to improve data handling accuracy.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent update in the codebase introduces improved type specificity by leveraging the IndexOptions in the MongooseSchemaOptions.ts file. This change enhances the precision of the options field within the MongooseIndexOptions interface, replacing a generic type with a more defined one.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../mongoose/src/interfaces/MongooseSchemaOptions.ts	Imported IndexOptions and updated MongooseIndexOptions to use this instead of Record<string, unknown>.

Poem

🌟🐇 Ode to Code 🐇🌟

In the realm of code, where logic plays,
A tiny change makes brighter days.
From unknown depths to clarity's light,
Our types now strong, our errors slight.
Hop, hop, hooray, to type-safety's delight!

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fce493f and d464c23.

Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/orm/mongoose/src/interfaces/MongooseSchemaOptions.ts (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

packages/orm/mongoose/src/interfaces/MongooseSchemaOptions.ts (1)

41-41: The change to use IndexOptions instead of Record<string, unknown> enhances type specificity and clarity. Ensure all dependent code is updated accordingly.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Benchmarks

• Machine: linux x64 | 4 vCPUs | 15.6GB Mem
• Node: v18.20.2
• Run: Wed Apr 24 2024 12:11:27 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
• Method: autocannon -c 100 -d 10 -p 10 localhost:3000 (two rounds; one to warm-up, one to measure)

	Version	Router	Requests/s	Latency	Throughput/Mb
koa	2.13.4	✗	33083.6	29.70	5.90
tsed-koa	7.67.8	✓	11778.5	84.11	9.97
express	4.19.2	✓	10547.2	93.95	1.88
nest	8.4.3	✓	9798.4	101.17	2.35
express-injector	4.19.2	✗	9479.4	104.62	2.16
tsed-express	7.67.8	✓	8504.2	116.50	1.56
express-morgan	4.19.2	✗	5613.6	176.38	1.00
fastify-big-json	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify-injector	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
fastify	3.29.4	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A
nest-fastify	8.4.3	✓	N/A	N/A	N/A

Explanation

The benchmark shows a performance difference between the frameworks. We note that Ts.ED is often last. In fact, Ts.ED uses features useful to a production application which reduce its performance.

For example, Ts.ED initializes a sandbox (async_hook) for each request in order to work in an isolated context if necessary.
It also initializes the elements necessary for monitoring requests in a log manager.

All this at a necessary cost that reflects the reality of a production application ;)

[Romakita]

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.68.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• v7.68.0
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀