Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Update LangSmith API for Organization and Workspace Management Enhancements #139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Nov 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new endpoints for creating, updating, and deleting organizations and workspaces.
    • Enhanced management of roles and permissions within organizations and workspaces.
    • Added features for managing shared resources across organizations and workspaces.
    • Improved organization and workspace schemas with configuration options and usage limits.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Deprecated outdated tenant-related endpoints to streamline API usage.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant updates to the LangSmith API, particularly in the management of organizations, workspaces, and their members. New endpoints have been introduced for creating, updating, and deleting these entities, along with enhancements to their schemas. Additionally, some tenant-related endpoints have been deprecated, and new functionalities for managing roles, permissions, and shared resources have been added.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml Added endpoints for organization and workspace management, including creation, updates, deletions, and member management. Enhanced schemas with configuration options, usage limits, and feature flags. Deprecated tenant-related endpoints.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • github-actions

🐇 In the meadow, we hop and play,
New workspaces bloom, bright as day.
With roles and tags, we share and grow,
In LangSmith's land, watch our dreams flow!
Join us, dear friends, in this joyful quest,
For managing teams, we’ll do our best! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge November 26, 2024 01:40
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit fc36960 into main Nov 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Update LangSmith API for Organization and Workspace Management Enhancements Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (1)

6675-6680: Enhance documentation for the include_deleted parameter

The include_deleted parameter is consistently added across list endpoints, but its behavior and implications could be better documented.

Consider adding more detailed descriptions:

        - name: include_deleted
          in: query
          schema:
            title: Include Deleted
+           description: When true, includes soft-deleted workspaces in the response. Default is false to maintain backward compatibility.
            type: boolean
            default: false

Also applies to: 7597-7603

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6fb8a4 and 1bc5d89.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (6)
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.ITenantClient.ListTenants.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.IWorkspacesClient.ListWorkspaces.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.AppSchemasTenant.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.TenantForUser.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.TenantClient.ListTenants.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.WorkspacesClient.ListWorkspaces.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (2)

7614-7619: LGTM! Well-structured error response schema

The error response follows OpenAPI best practices with proper validation error handling and security requirements.


6675-6680: Verify consistent implementation of soft-delete functionality

The addition of soft-delete functionality is a significant change. Let's verify its consistent implementation across the API.

Also applies to: 7597-7603, 19564-19564, 19586-19588

✅ Verification successful

Soft-delete functionality is consistently implemented

Based on the verification results:

  1. The include_deleted parameter is properly implemented in list endpoints for:

    • Tenants (/api/v1/tenants)
    • Workspaces (/api/v1/workspaces)
  2. The is_deleted field is correctly defined in relevant schemas for:

    • Tenant objects
    • Workspace objects
  3. All delete operations are properly defined with appropriate security requirements and error handling.

The soft-delete implementation follows a consistent pattern across the API with:

  • Query parameter for including deleted items in list operations
  • Schema support for tracking deletion status
  • Proper endpoint definitions for delete operations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent implementation of soft-delete functionality

# Check if all list endpoints have include_deleted parameter
echo "Checking list endpoints for include_deleted parameter..."
rg -A 5 "get:" | rg -B 5 "parameters:" | rg "include_deleted"

# Check if all relevant schemas have is_deleted property
echo "Checking schemas for is_deleted property..."
rg -A 5 "type: object" | rg -B 5 "is_deleted"

# Check for potential missing error handling
echo "Checking error responses for endpoints with include_deleted..."
rg -A 10 "include_deleted" | rg "responses:" -A 10 | rg "422"

Length of output: 516


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify soft-delete implementation

# Search for include_deleted parameter definitions
echo "Searching for include_deleted parameter definitions..."
rg -l "include_deleted"

# If found, let's examine each file's content around include_deleted
echo "Examining context around include_deleted..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "include_deleted"

# Search for delete-related operations
echo "Searching for delete operations..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "delete:"

# Search for is_deleted in schema definitions
echo "Searching for is_deleted in schemas..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "is_deleted:"

Length of output: 56936

@@ -19542,6 +19561,7 @@ components:
- created_at
- display_name
- is_personal
- is_deleted
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider making is_deleted optional with a default value

Making is_deleted a required field could break existing clients. Consider:

  1. Making it optional by removing it from the required fields list
  2. Adding a default value of false
-        - is_deleted
      type: object
      properties:
        is_deleted:
          title: Is Deleted
          type: boolean
+         default: false

Additionally, consider extracting common soft-delete properties into a shared component schema to reduce duplication.

# Add to components/schemas
SoftDeleteProperties:
  type: object
  properties:
    is_deleted:
      title: Is Deleted
      type: boolean
      default: false

# Then in your schemas
allOf:
  - $ref: '#/components/schemas/SoftDeleteProperties'

Also applies to: 19586-19588, 20523-20523, 20545-20547

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant