Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: 5.1.2. Using scope Parameter to Request Issuance of a Credential #1595

Conversation

mishasizov-SK
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Mykhailo Sizov <mykhailo.sizov@securekey.com>
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Feb 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0f972c9) 85.38% compared to head (f674206) 85.43%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           OIDC4VCI_ID1    #1595      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         85.38%   85.43%   +0.05%     
================================================
  Files               172      172              
  Lines             11336    11379      +43     
================================================
+ Hits               9679     9722      +43     
  Misses             1204     1204              
  Partials            453      453              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mishasizov-SK mishasizov-SK merged commit adf1719 into trustbloc:OIDC4VCI_ID1 Feb 8, 2024
10 checks passed
@mishasizov-SK mishasizov-SK deleted the feat-5.1.2.-Using-scope-Parameter-to-Request-Issuance-of-a-Credential-v2 branch February 8, 2024 12:14
mishasizov-SK added a commit to mishasizov-SK/vcs that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
trustbloc#1595)

Signed-off-by: Mykhailo Sizov <mykhailo.sizov@securekey.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants