Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct secret usage with dynamic catalogs #19883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

mosabua
Copy link
Member

@mosabua mosabua commented Nov 23, 2023

Description

As result of testing and discussion slack https://trinodb.slack.com/archives/CGB0QHWSW/p1699634554649649

Turns out the env variable is not resolved and propagated to the workers, but the value of the properties is left as is .. so kinda less dynamic for this scenario. But maybe more secure... worth thinking about if this is by design or a bug maybe @dain .. I can think of pros and cons for each

Release notes

(x) This is not user-visible or is docs only, and no release notes are required.
( ) Release notes are required. Please propose a release note for me.
( ) Release notes are required, with the following suggested text:

# Section
* Fix some things. ({issue}`issuenumber`)

@mosabua mosabua requested a review from dain November 23, 2023 22:33
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Nov 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Nov 23, 2023
@mosabua mosabua requested a review from electrum November 23, 2023 22:43
@mosabua
Copy link
Member Author

mosabua commented Nov 27, 2023

Added a task at #12709

@mosabua mosabua merged commit 0570702 into trinodb:master Nov 27, 2023
@mosabua mosabua deleted the dynamic-catalog-env branch November 27, 2023 18:48
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 434 milestone Nov 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants